The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO2 Hydrogenation on Unpromoted and M-Promoted Co/TiO2 Catalysts (M = Zr, K, Cs): Effects of Crystal Phase of Supports and Metal–Support Interaction on Tuning Product Distribution
Abstract
Cobalt catalysts supported on TiO 2 with different crystal forms (anatase and rutile) differ sharply in CO 2 conversion and product selectivity for CO 2 hydrogenation. The Co/rutile-TiO 2 catalyst selectively catalyzed CO 2 hydrogenation to CH 4, while CO is the main product on the Co/anatase-TiO 2 catalyst. In situ DRIFT (diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform) results have partially revealed the reaction pathway of CO 2 hydrogenation on these two catalysts. On Co/rutile-TiO 2, the reaction proceeds through the key intermediate formate species, which is further converted to CH 4 . Differently, the reaction on Co/anatase-TiO 2 undergoes CO 2 → *CO, which desorbs to form gas-phase CO instead of subsequent hydrogenation. The strongly bonded *CO is required to enhance the subsequent hydrogenation. By simply changing the calcination temperature of anatase TiO 2, the product selectivity can be tuned from CO to CH 4 with a significant increase in CO 2 conversion due to the surface phase transition of the anatase to the rutile phase. The addition of Zr, K, and Cs further improves the CO, CO 2, and H 2 adsorption in both the capacity and strength over anatase- and rutile-supported catalysts. The Zr modification makes the reaction pathway over anatase-supported catalyst proceed via the intermediate formate species and enables the subsequent hydrogenation to CH 4 . In addition, the surface C/H ratio increases significantly in the presence of promoters (unpromoted < Zr-promoted < K-Zr-promoted ∼ Cs-Zr-promoted), which leads to the highest C 2 + selectivity of 17% with 70% CO 2 conversion over K-Zr-Co/anatase-TiO 2 catalyst. These results reveal mechanistic insights into how the product distribution of Co/TiO 2 catalysts can be manipulated through adjusting the adsorption performance and surface C/H ratio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis
Dimitriou, I., García-Gutiérrez, P., Elder, R. H., Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., Azapagic, A., & Allen, R. W. K. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee04117h · Cited by 301
CO2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over Co and Fe-based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts
Visconti, C. G., Martinelli, M., Falbo, L., Fratalocchi, L., & Lietti, L. (2016) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2016.04.010 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Advances in the Design of Heterogeneous Catalysts and Thermocatalytic Processes for CO2 Utilization
De, S., Dokania, A., Ramirez, A., & Gascon, J. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04273 · Cited by 355
Xu, Y., Zhai, P., Deng, Y., Xie, J., Liu, X., Wang, S., & Ma, D. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202009620 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Zhang, G., Jiang, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, J., Ding, F., Liu, Z., Guo, X., & Song, C.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-02-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2739-2751
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913804493
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.