Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced CO2 Methanation Activity of Ni/Anatase Catalyst by Tuning Strong Metal–Support Interactions

Li, Jian, Lin, Yaping, Pan, Xiulian, Miao, Dengyun, Ding, Ding, Cui, Yi, Dong, Jinhu, Bao, Xinhe·2019·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) has been widely recognized for platinum-group metals on reducible oxide supports. Herein we report that the catalytic activity of Ni catalyst in CO 2 methanation is significantly suppressed over conventional anatase (a-TiO 2 ) support due to the SMSI-induced formation of a titania overlayer around the Ni nanoparticles. Furthermore, CO is the only product . In contrast, the NH 3 -treatment and H 2 -treatment of the a-TiO 2 support enhance remarkably the activity of Ni, i.e., CO 2 conversion increases by 1 order of magnitude and CO 2 is hydrogenated almost exclusively to CH 4 . X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), H 2 and CO chemisorption, and low temperature electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) reveal that the enhanced CO 2 methanation activity may be related with the Ti 3+ species in the bulk that are generated by reduction treatment, which likely have altered the SMSI between Ni and a-TiO 2 support. This simple reduction treatment approach may be applicable to modulate the SMSI of other reducible oxide-supported metal catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.9b00401

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Li, J., Lin, Y., Pan, X., Miao, D., Ding, D., Cui, Y., Dong, J., & Bao, X.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
6342-6348
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969051621
Cited by
244
References
3
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.