CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 239Advanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies Research

Ion Transport and the True Transference Number in Nonaqueous Polyelectrolyte Solutions for Lithium Ion Batteries

Open access
Fong, Kara D., Self, Julian, Diederichsen, Kyle M., Wood, Brandon M., McCloskey, Bryan D., Persson, Kristin A.·2019·ACS Central Science
DOI 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00406PMC PMC6661974
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

transference numbers much lower than previously estimated experimentally. We quantify the ion-ion correlations unique to polyelectrolyte systems that are responsible for this surprising behavior. These results highlight the need to reconsider the approximations typically made for transport in polyelectrolyte solutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00406

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At high charge rates, low lithium-ion transference number means Li+ transport in the electrolyte cannot catch up with Li+ entering the electrode, causing a steep Li+ concentration profile at the interphase that limits lithium-ion battery performance.

    “This means at high charge rates the speed of Li + transport in the electrolyte cannot catch up with the Li + entering the electrode, resulting in a steep Li + concentration profile at the interphase limiting the LIB performance [7,8].”

    From Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Newman J.; Thomas-Alyea K. E. Electrochemical Systems, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2004.
  2. Valoen L. O.; Reimers J. N. Transport properties of LiPF6-based Li-ion battery electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A882 10.1149/1.1872737. · DOI
  3. Gering K. L. Prediction of electrolyte conductivity: results from a generalized molecular model based on ion solvation and a chemical physics framework. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 225, 175– 189. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.083. · DOI
  4. Doyle M.; Fuller T. F.; Newman J. The importance of the lithium ion transference number in lithium/polymer cells. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 2073– 2081. 10.1016/0013-4686(94)85091-7. · DOI
  5. Diederichsen K. M.; McShane E. J.; McCloskey B. D. Promising routes to a high Li+ transference number electrolyte for lithium ion batteries. ACS Energy Letters 2017, 2, 2563– 2575. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00792. · DOI
  6. Lu Y.; Tikekar M.; Mohanty R.; Hendrickson K.; Ma L.; Archer L. A. Stable cycling of lithium metal batteries using high transference number electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1402073 10.1002/aenm.201402073. · DOI
  7. Murugan R.; Thangadurai V.; Weppner W. Fast lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li7La 3Zr2O12. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7778– 7781. 10.1002/anie.200701144. 17803180 · DOI
  8. Aono H. Ionic conductivity of the lithium titanium phosphate (Li1+XMXTi2–X(PO4)3, M = Al, Sc, Y, and La) systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 590 10.1149/1.2096693. · DOI
  9. Kamaya N.; Homma K.; Yamakawa Y.; Hirayama M.; Kanno R.; Yonemura M.; Kamiyama T.; Kato Y.; Hama S.; Kawamoto K.; Mitsui A. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 682– 686. 10.1038/nmat3066. 21804556 · DOI
  10. Kato Y.; Hori S.; Saito T.; Suzuki K.; Hirayama M.; Mitsui A.; Yonemura M.; Iba H.; Kanno R. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nature Energy 2016, 1, 16030 10.1038/nenergy.2016.30. · DOI
  11. Matsumi N.; Sugai K.; Ohno H. Ion conductive characteristics of alkylborane type and boric ester type polymer electrolytes derived from mesithylborane. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 2321– 2326. 10.1021/ma021734u. · DOI
  12. Zhang H.; Li C.; Piszcz M.; Coya E.; Rojo T.; Rodriguez-Martinez L. M.; Armand M.; Zhou Z. Single lithium-ion conducting solid polymer electrolytes: Advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 797– 815. 10.1039/C6CS00491A. 28098280 · DOI
  13. Kobayashi N.; Uchiyama M.; Tsuchida E. Poly[lithium methacrylate-co-oligo(oxyethylene)methacrylate] as a solid electrolyte with high ionic conductivity. Solid State Ionics 1985, 17, 307– 311. 10.1016/0167-2738(85)90075-X. · DOI
  14. Klein R. J.; Welna D. T.; Weikel A. L.; Allcock H. R.; Runt J. Counterion effects on ion mobility and mobile ion concentration of doped polyphosphazene and polyphosphazene ionomers. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 3990– 3995. 10.1021/ma070357o. · DOI
  15. Buss H. G.; Chan S. Y.; Lynd N. A.; McCloskey B. D. Nonaqueous polyelectrolyte solutions as liquid electrolytes with high lithium ion transference number and conductivity. ACS Energy Letters 2017, 2, 481– 487. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00724. · DOI
  16. Diederichsen K. M.; Fong K. D.; Terrell R. C.; Persson K. A.; McCloskey B. D. Investigation of solvent type and salt addition in high transference number nonaqueous polyelectrolyte solutions for lithium ion batteries. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 8761– 8771. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01696. · DOI
  17. Smiatek J.; Wohlfarth A.; Holm C. The solvation and ion condensation properties for sulfonated polyelectrolytes in different solvents - A computational study. New J. Phys. 2014, 16, 025001 10.1088/1367-2630/16/2/025001. · DOI
  18. Kreuer K. D.; Wohlfarth A.; De Araujo C. C.; Fuchs A.; Maier J. Single alkaline-ion (Li+, Na+) conductors by ion exchange of proton-conducting ionomers and polyelectrolytes. ChemPhysChem 2011, 12, 2558– 2560. 10.1002/cphc.201100506. 21793154 · DOI
  19. Marcus Y.; Hefter G. Ion pairing. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4585– 4621. 10.1021/cr040087x. 17091929 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Muthukumar M. 50th Anniversary perspective: A perspective on polyelectrolyte solutions. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9528– 9560. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01929. 29296029 PMC5746850 · DOI
  21. Dobrynin A. V. Polymer Science: A Comprehensive Reference; Elsevier, 2012; Vol. 1, pp 81– 132.
  22. Borodin O.; Smith G. D. Quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics simulation study of dimethyl carbonate: Ethylene carbonate electrolytes doped with LiPF6. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 1763– 1776. 10.1021/jp809614h. 19146427 · DOI
  23. Borodin O.; Smith G. D. LiTFSI structure and transport in ethylene carbonate from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 4971– 4977. 10.1021/jp056249q. 16526738 · DOI
  24. Savoie B. M.; Webb M. A.; Miller T. F. Enhancing cation diffusion and suppressing anion diffusion via Lewis-acidic polymer electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 641– 646. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02662. 28075599 · DOI
  25. Müller-Plathe F.; Van Gunsteren W. F. Computer simulation of a polymer electrolyte: Lithium iodide in amorphous poly(ethylene oxide). J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 4745– 4756. 10.1063/1.470611. · DOI
  26. Webb M. A.; Jung Y.; Pesko D. M.; Savoie B. M.; Yamamoto U.; Coates G. W.; Balsara N. P.; Wang Z. G.; Miller T. F. Systematic computational and experimental investigation of lithium-ion transport mechanisms in polyester-based polymer electrolytes. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 198– 205. 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00195. 27162971 PMC4827473 · DOI
  27. Diddens D.; Heuer A. Simulation study of the lithium ion transport mechanism in ternary polymer electrolytes: The critical role of the segmental mobility. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1113– 1125. 10.1021/jp409800r. 24383892 · DOI
  28. Webb M. A.; Yamamoto U.; Savoie B. M.; Wang Z. G.; Miller T. F. Globally suppressed dynamics in ion-doped polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 734– 738. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00237. 35632956 · DOI
  29. Ennari J.; Elomaa M.; Sundholm F. Modelling a polyelectrolyte system in water to estimate the ion-conductivity. Polymer 1999, 40, 5035– 5041. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00731-9. · DOI
  30. Carrillo J. M. Y.; Dobrynin A. V. Detailed molecular dynamics simulations of a model NaPSS in water. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 9391– 9399. 10.1021/jp101978k. 20604505 · DOI
  31. Wohlfarth A.; Smiatek J.; Kreuer K.-D.; Takamuku S.; Jannasch P.; Maier J. Proton dissociation of sulfonated polysulfones: Influence of molecular structure and conformation. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 1134– 1143. 10.1021/ma502550f. · DOI
  32. Lyubartsev A. P.; Laaksonen A. Molecular dynamics simulations of DNA in solution with different counter-ions. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1998, 16, 579– 592. 10.1080/07391102.1998.10508271. 10052615 · DOI
  33. Yang L.; Weerasinghe S.; Smith P.; Pettitt B. Dielectric response of triplex DNA in ionic solution from simulations. Biophys. J. 1995, 69, 1519– 1527. 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80022-6. 8534822 PMC1236382 · DOI
  34. Frischknecht A. L.; Winey K. I. The evolution of acidic and ionic aggregates in ionomers during microsecond simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 064901 10.1063/1.5085069. 30769997 · DOI
  35. Ting C. L.; Stevens M. J.; Frischknecht A. L. Structure and dynamics of coarse-grained ionomer melts in an external electric field. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 809– 818. 10.1021/ma501916z. · DOI
  36. Hall L. M.; Seitz M. E.; Winey K. I.; Opper K. L.; Wagener K. B.; Stevens M. J.; Frischknecht A. L. Ionic aggregate structure in ionomer melts: Effect of molecular architecture on aggregates and the ionomer peak. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 574– 587. 10.1021/ja209142b. 22133577 · DOI
  37. Ma B.; Nguyen T. D.; Pryamitsyn V. A.; Olvera De La Cruz M. Ionic correlations in random ionomers. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2311– 2318. 10.1021/acsnano.7b07432. 29493221 · DOI
  38. Micka U.; Holm C.; Kremer K. Strongly charged, flexible polyelectrolytes in poor solvents: molecular dynamics simulations. Langmuir 1999, 15, 4033– 4044. 10.1021/la981191a. · DOI
  39. Liao Q.; Dobrynin A. V.; Rubinstein M. Molecular dynamics simulations of polyelectrolyte solutions: Nonuniform stretching of chains and scaling behavior. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 3386– 3398. 10.1021/ma025995f. · DOI
  40. Stevens M. J.; Kremer K. The nature of flexible linear polyelectrolytes in salt free solution: A molecular dynamics study. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 1669– 1690. 10.1063/1.470698. · DOI
  41. Chremos A.; Douglas J. The influence of polymer and ion solvation on the conformational properties of flexible polyelectrolytes. Gels 2018, 4, 20 10.3390/gels4010020. PMC6318697 30674796 · DOI
  42. Burlatsky S.; Darling R. M.; Novikov D.; Atrazhev V. V.; Sultanov V. I.; Astakhova T. Y.; Su L.; Brushett F. Molecular dynamics modeling of the conductivity of lithiated Nafion containing nonaqueous solvents. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A2232– A2239. 10.1149/2.0461610jes. · DOI
  43. Johansson P. Electronic structure calculations on lithium battery electrolyte salts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1493– 1498. 10.1039/B612297C. 17356757 · DOI
  44. Xu K. Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4303– 4418. 10.1021/cr030203g. 15669157 · DOI
  45. France-Lanord A.; Grossman J. C. Correlations from ion pairing and the Nernst-Einstein equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 136001 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.136001. 31012622 · DOI
  46. Manning G. S. Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions I. Colligative properties. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 51, 924– 933. 10.1063/1.1672157. · DOI
  47. Manning G. S. Counterion binding in polyelectrolyte theory. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 443– 449. 10.1021/ar50144a004. · DOI
  48. Nyquist R. M.; Ha B. Y.; Liu A. J. Counterion condensation in solutions of rigid polyelectrolytes. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 3481– 3487. 10.1021/ma9811021. · DOI
  49. González-Mozuelos P.; De La Cruz M. O. Ion condensation in salt-free dilute polyelectrolyte solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 3145– 3157. 10.1063/1.470248. · DOI
  50. Tenney C. M.; Cygan R. T. Analysis of molecular clusters in simulations of lithium-ion battery electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 24673– 24684. 10.1021/jp4039122. · DOI
  51. Ullner M.; Woodward C. E. Orientational correlation function and persistence lengths of flexible polyelectrolytes. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 1437– 1445. 10.1021/ma010863s. · DOI
  52. Odijk T. Polyelectrolytes near the rod limit. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 1977, 15, 477– 483. 10.1002/pol.1977.180150307. · DOI
  53. Skolnick J.; Fixman M. Electrostatic persistence length of a wormlike polyelectrolyte. Macromolecules 1977, 10, 944– 948. 10.1021/ma60059a011. · DOI
  54. Salanne M. Simulations of room temperature ionic liquids: From polarizable to coarse-grained force fields. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 14270– 14279. 10.1039/C4CP05550K. 25592219 · DOI
  55. Rajput N. N.; Murugesan V.; Shin Y.; Han K. S.; Lau K. C.; Chen J.; Liu J.; Curtiss L. A.; Mueller K. T.; Persson K. A. Elucidating the solvation structure and dynamics of lithium polysulfides resulting from competitive salt and solvent interactions. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 3375– 3379. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00068. · DOI
  56. Dünweg B.; Kremer K. Molecular dynamics simulation of a polymer chain in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 6983– 6997. 10.1063/1.465445. · DOI
  57. Castiglione F.; Ragg E.; Mele A.; Appetecchi G. B.; Montanino M.; Passerini S. Molecular environment and enhanced diffusivity of Li+ ions in lithium-salt-doped ionic liquid electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 153– 157. 10.1021/jz101516c. · DOI
  58. Sorte E. G.; Paren B. A.; Rodriguez C. G.; Fujimoto C.; Poirier C.; Abbott L. J.; Lynd N. A.; Winey K. I.; Frischknecht A. L.; Alam T. M. Impact of hydration and sulfonation on the morphology and ionic conductivity of sulfonated poly(phenylene) proton exchange membranes. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 857– 876. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02013. · DOI
  59. Solano C. J.; Jeremias S.; Paillard E.; Beljonne D.; Lazzaroni R. A joint theoretical/experimental study of the structure, dynamics, and Li+ transport in bis([tri]fluoro[methane]sulfonyl)imide [T]FSI-based ionic liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 034502 10.1063/1.4813413. 23883042 · DOI
  60. Borodin O.; Smith G. D.; Henderson W. Li+ cation environment, transport, and mechanical properties of the LiTFSI doped N-methyl-N-alkylpyrrolidinium+TFSI– ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 16879– 16886. 10.1021/jp061930t. 16927976 · DOI
  61. Druger S. D.; Nitzan A.; Ratner M. A. Dynamic bond percolation theory: A microscopic model for diffusion in dynamically disordered systems. I. Definition and one-dimensional case. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 3133– 3142. 10.1063/1.446144. · DOI
  62. Borodin O.; Smith G. D. Mechanism of ion transport in amorphous poly(ethylene oxide)/ LiTFSI from molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 1620– 1629. 10.1021/ma052277v. · DOI
  63. Reger A.; Peled E.; Gileadi E. Mechanism of high conductivity in a medium of low dielectric constant. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 873– 879. 10.1021/j100470a023. · DOI
  64. Hwang S.; Kim D. H.; Shin J. H.; Jang J. E.; Ahn K. H.; Lee C.; Lee H. Ionic conduction and solution structure in LiPF6 and LiBF4 propylene carbonate electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 19438– 19446. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06035. · DOI
  65. Kamcev J.; Paul D. R.; Manning G. S.; Freeman B. D. Ion diffusion coefficients in ion exchange membranes: significance of counterion condensation. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 5519– 5529. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00645. · DOI
  66. Wright M. R. An Introduction to Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions; John Wiley, 2007.
  67. Yeh I.-C.; Hummer G. Diffusion and electrophoretic mobility of single-stranded RNA from molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 681– 689. 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74147-8. 14747307 PMC1303919 · DOI
  68. Bruce P. G.; Vincent C. A. Steady state current flow in solid binary electrolyte cells. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1987, 225, 1– 17. 10.1016/0022-0728(87)80001-3. · DOI
  69. Balsara N. P.; Newman J. Relationship between steady-state current in symmetric cells and transference number of electrolytes comprising univalent and multivalent ions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A2720– A2722. 10.1149/2.0651514jes. · DOI
  70. Bruce P. G.; Hardgrave M. T.; Vincent C. A. The determination of transference numbers in solid polymer electrolytes using the Hittorf method. Solid State Ionics 1992, 53–56, 1087– 1094. 10.1016/0167-2738(92)90295-Z. · DOI
  71. Fritz H. P.; Kuhn A. Comparative determination of effective transport numbers in solid lithium electrolytes. J. Power Sources 1993, 41, 253– 261. 10.1016/0378-7753(93)80043-O. · DOI
  72. Walls H. J. Anion and cation transference numbers determined by electrophoretic NMR of polymer electrolytes sum to unity. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 1999, 3, 321 10.1149/1.1391136. · DOI
  73. Dong D.; Bedrov D. Charge transport in [Li(tetraglyme)][bis(trifluoromethane) sulfonimide] solvate ionic liquids: insight from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 9994– 10004. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06913. 30299097 · DOI
  74. McDaniel J. G.; Son C. Y. Ion correlation and collective dynamics in BMIM/BF4– based organic electrolytes: From dilute solutions to the ionic liquid limit. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 7154– 7169. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b04886. 29927596 · DOI
  75. Kashyap H. K.; Annapureddy H. V. R.; Raineri F. O.; Margulis C. J. How is charge transport different in ionic liquids and electrolyte solutions?. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 13212– 13221. 10.1021/jp204182c. 22022889 · DOI
  76. Dong D.; Sälzer F.; Roling B.; Bedrov D. How efficient is Li+ ion transport in solvate ionic liquids under anion-blocking conditions in a battery?. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 29174– 29183. 10.1039/C8CP06214E. 30426990 · DOI
  77. Molinari N.; Mailoa J. P.; Kozinsky B. General trend of negative transference number in Li salt/ionic liquid mixtures. 2019, 1– 21, 10.26434/chemrxiv.7728545. · DOI
  78. Vink H. Physical Chemistry of Polyelectrolytes; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2001; Chapter 7, pp 225– 244.
  79. Vink H. The dynamic frictional theory of transport processes in relation to nonequilibrium thermodynamics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1993, 160, 51– 58. 10.1006/jcis.1993.1366. · DOI
  80. Colby R. H.; Boris D. C.; Krause W. E.; Tan J. S. Polyelectrolyte conductivity. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1997, 35, 2951– 2960. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199712)35:17<2951::AID-POLB18>3.0.CO;2-6. · DOI
  81. Haskins J. B.; Bennett W. R.; Wu J. J.; Hernández D. M.; Borodin O.; Monk J. D.; Bauschlicher C. W.; Lawson J. W. Computational and experimental investigation of Li-doped ionic liquid electrolytes: [pyr14][TFSI], [pyr13][FSI], and [EMIM][BF4]. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 11295– 11309. 10.1021/jp5061705. 25159701 · DOI
  82. Muthukumar M. Dynamics of polyelectrolyte solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 2619– 2635. 10.1063/1.474573. · DOI
  83. Chatare V.; Chereddy S.; Gobet M. P.; Wunder S. L.; DiLuzio S. P.; Greenbaum S. G.; Chinnam P. R. An alternative route to single ion conductivity using multi-ionic salts. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5, 461– 473. 10.1039/C7MH01130J. · DOI
  84. Martínez L.; Andrade R.; Birgin E. G.; Martínez J. M. PACKMOL: A package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2157– 2164. 10.1002/jcc.21224. 19229944 · DOI
  85. Toukmaji A. Y.; Board J. A. Ewald summation techniques in perspective: a survey. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2003, 95, 73– 92. 10.1016/0010-4655(96)00016-1. · DOI
  86. Andersen H. C. Rattle: A ”velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 1983, 52, 24– 34. 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-1. · DOI
  87. Ryckaert J. P.; Ciccotti G.; Berendsen H. J. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 327– 341. 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5. · DOI
  88. Banks J. L.; et al. Integrated modeling program, applied chemical theory (IMPACT). J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1752– 1780. 10.1002/jcc.20292. 16211539 PMC2742605 · DOI
  89. Leontyev I.; Stuchebrukhov A. Accounting for electronic polarization in non-polarizable force fields. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 2613– 2626. 10.1039/c0cp01971b. 21212894 · DOI
  90. Michaud-Agrawal N.; Denning E. J.; Woolf T. B.; Beckstein O. MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 2319– 2327. 10.1002/jcc.21787. 21500218 PMC3144279 · DOI
  91. Gowers R.; Linke M.; Barnoud J.; Reddy T.; Melo M.; Seyler S.; Domański J.; Dotson D.; Buchoux S.; Kenney I.; Beckstein O. MDAnalysis: A Python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference 2016, 98– 105. 10.25080/Majora-629e541a-00e. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fong, K. D., Self, J., Diederichsen, K. M., Wood, B. M., McCloskey, B. D., & Persson, K. A.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • McCloskey, Bryan D.
  • Persson, Kristin A.
ORCID
Venue
ACS Central Science
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
1250-1260
ISSN
  • 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-7951
DOI
10.1021/acscentsci.9b00406
PMC
PMC6661974
OpenAlex
W2951353713
Cited by
239
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 7
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • ACS Central Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Graduate Education (DGE 1752814)
  • Vehicle Technologies Program (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Keywords
transference number, ion transport, polyelectrolyte solutions, non-aqueous electrolytes, lithium-ion batteries, ion-ion correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review