Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building a Consistent and Reproducible Database for Adsorption Evaluation in Covalent–Organic Frameworks

Open access
Ongari, Daniele, Yakutovich, Aliaksandr V., Talirz, Leopold, Smit, Berend·2019·ACS Central Science

Abstract

We present a workflow that traces the path from the bulk structure of a crystalline material to assessing its performance in carbon capture from coal's postcombustion flue gases.This workflow is applied to a database of 324 covalent-organic frameworks (COFs) reported in the literature, to characterize their CO 2 adsorption properties using the following steps: (1) optimization of the crystal structure (atomic positions and unit cell) using density functional theory, (2) fitting atomic point charges based on the electron density, (3) characterizing the pore geometry of the structures before and after optimization, (4) computing carbon dioxide and nitrogen isotherms using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations with an empirical interaction potential, and finally, (5) assessing the CO 2 parasitic energy via process modeling.The full workflow has been encoded in the Automated Interactive Infrastructure and Database for Computational Science (AiiDA).Both the workflow and the automatically generated provenance graph of our calculations are made available on the Materials Cloud, allowing peers to inspect every input parameter and result along the workflow, download structures and files at intermediate stages, and start their research right from where this work has left off.In particular, our set of CURATED (Clean, Uniform, and Refined with Automatic Tracking from Experimental Database) COFs, having optimized geometry and high-quality DFT-derived point charges, are available for further investigations of gas adsorption properties.We plan to update the database as new COFs are being reported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00619

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Ongari, D., Yakutovich, A. V., Talirz, L., & Smit, B.
Venue
ACS Central Science
Published
2019-09-26
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
1663-1675
ISSN
  • 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-7951
OpenAlex
W2954184206
Cited by
194
References
1
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building a Consistent and Reproducible Database for Adsorption Evaluation in Covalent–Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00619
The paper
Ongari, D., Yakutovich, A. V., Talirz, L., & Smit, B. (2019). Building a Consistent and Reproducible Database for Adsorption Evaluation in Covalent–Organic Frameworks. ACS Central Science. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00619

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.