The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building a Consistent and Reproducible Database for Adsorption Evaluation in Covalent–Organic Frameworks
Open accessAbstract
We present a workflow that traces the path from the bulk structure of a crystalline material to assessing its performance in carbon capture from coal's postcombustion flue gases.This workflow is applied to a database of 324 covalent-organic frameworks (COFs) reported in the literature, to characterize their CO 2 adsorption properties using the following steps: (1) optimization of the crystal structure (atomic positions and unit cell) using density functional theory, (2) fitting atomic point charges based on the electron density, (3) characterizing the pore geometry of the structures before and after optimization, (4) computing carbon dioxide and nitrogen isotherms using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations with an empirical interaction potential, and finally, (5) assessing the CO 2 parasitic energy via process modeling.The full workflow has been encoded in the Automated Interactive Infrastructure and Database for Computational Science (AiiDA).Both the workflow and the automatically generated provenance graph of our calculations are made available on the Materials Cloud, allowing peers to inspect every input parameter and result along the workflow, download structures and files at intermediate stages, and start their research right from where this work has left off.In particular, our set of CURATED (Clean, Uniform, and Refined with Automatic Tracking from Experimental Database) COFs, having optimized geometry and high-quality DFT-derived point charges, are available for further investigations of gas adsorption properties.We plan to update the database as new COFs are being reported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Cited by
Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M., & Smit, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 · Cited by 599
Self-citationFeng, X., Wang, X., Redshaw, C., & Tang, B. Z. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00251a · Cited by 382
Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture
Farmahini, A. H., Krishnamurthy, S., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., & Sarkisov, L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ongari, D., Yakutovich, A. V., Talirz, L., & Smit, B.
- Venue
- ACS Central Science
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-09-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1663-1675
- ISSN
- 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-7951
- OpenAlex
- W2954184206
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building a Consistent and Reproducible Database for Adsorption Evaluation in Covalent–Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00619
- The paper
- Ongari, D., Yakutovich, A. V., Talirz, L., & Smit, B. (2019). Building a Consistent and Reproducible Database for Adsorption Evaluation in Covalent–Organic Frameworks. ACS Central Science. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.