Cited by 25Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Carbon Monoxide in Optically Thick Wildfire Smoke: Evaluating TROPOMI Using CU Airborne SOF Column Observations

Rowe, Jake P., Zarzana, Kyle J., Kille, Natalie, Borsdorff, Tobias, Goudar, Manu, Lee, Christopher F., Koenig, Theodore K., Romero-Alvarez, Johana +5 more·2022·ACS Earth and Space Chemistry

Abstract

TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) measurements of carbon monoxide (CO) vertical column enhancements in optically thick biomass burning plumes were evaluated using measurements from the University of Colorado Airborne Solar Occultation Flux (CU AirSOF) instrument during the 2018 Biomass Burning Fluxes of Trace Gases and Aerosols (BB-FLUX) field campaign in the northwestern United States. The different temporal and spatial scales and measurement geometries sampled from the aircraft and satellite are actively accounted for by (1) focusing on coincident measurements, (2) comparing spatial integrals of CO enhancements across plume transects, (3) using the FLEXible PARTicle (FLEXPART) dispersion model to correct for atmospheric transport, and (4) accounting for Averaging Kernels (AVK). TROPOMI is found to be systematically higher relative to the aircraft by +36% for the operational product (+27% preoperational product) without geospatial and temporal corrections. Consecutive transects by CU AirSOF revealed significant variations between integrated CO enhancements (on average 28% over 30 min) on the satellite sub-pixel scale. When the additional corrections are applied (FLEXPART, and to a lesser degree also AVK), the average bias is reduced to +10% for the operational product (+7.2% preoperational), which is insignificant within 15% uncertainty (variability among case studies, 95% confidence level). Radiative transfer simulations in synthetic plumes indicate that multiple…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Rowe, J. P., Zarzana, K. J., Kille, N., Borsdorff, T., Goudar, M., Lee, C. F., Koenig, T. K., Romero-Alvarez, J., Campos, T., Knote, C., Theys, N., Landgraf, J., & Volkamer, R.
Affiliations
  • Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Space Research Organisation Netherlands (NL)
  • Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0215, United States
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • University of Augsburg (DE)
  • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BE)
Corresponding author
Volkamer, Rainer
Venue
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
Published
2022-06-16
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
1799-1812
ISSN
2472-3452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283014210
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Space Agency (4000117151/16/I-LG)
  • Netherlands Space Office
  • Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (AGS-1754019)
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research (1852977)
  • Belgium Prodex (PEA 40001055989)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
carbon monoxide, TROPOMI, wildfire smoke, biomass burning plumes, satellite validation, averaging kernels, multiple scattering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review