The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Design: A High-Throughput Computational Screening and Experimental Validation Methodology for Lead-Free and Emergent Hybrid Perovskites
Abstract
Perovskite solar cells, with efficiencies of 22.1%, are the only solution-processable technology to outperform multicrystalline silicon and thin-film solar cells. Whereas substantial progress has been made in scalability and stability, toxicity concerns drive the need for lead replacement, intensifying research into the broad palette of elemental substitutions, solid solutions, and multidimensional structures. Perovskites have gone from comprising three to more than eight (CH 3 NH 3, HC(NH 2 ) 2, Cs, Rb, Pb, Sn, I, Br) organic and inorganic constituents, and a variety of new embodiments including layered, double perovskites, and metal-deficient perovskites are being explored. Although most experimentation is guided by intuition and trial-and-error-based Edisonian approaches, rational strategies underpinned by computational screening and targeted experimental validation are emerging. In addressing emergent perovskites, this perspective discusses the rational design methodology leveraging density functional theory-based high-throughput computational screening coupled to downselection strategies to accelerate the discovery of materials and industrialization of perovskite solar cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stranks, S. D., Eperon, G. E., Grancini, G., Menelaou, C., Alcocer, M. J. P., Leijtens, T., Herz, L. M., Petrozza, A., & Snaith, H. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243982 · Cited by 10,413
The high-throughput highway to computational materials design
Curtarolo, S., Hart, G. L. W., Nardelli, M. B., Mingo, N., Sanvito, S., & Levy, O. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3568 · Cited by 2,053
Tan, J. C., & Cheetham, A. K. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00163e · Cited by 762
Jain, A., Hautier, G., Ong, S. P., & Persson, K. (2016) · Journal of Materials Research · doi:10.1557/jmr.2016.80 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Accelerated discovery of stable lead-free hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites via machine learning
Lu, S., Zhou, Q., Ouyang, Y., Guo, Y., Li, Q., & Wang, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05761-w · Cited by 725
Progress on Perovskite Materials and Solar Cells with Mixed Cations and Halide Anions
Ono, L. K., Juarez-Perez, E. J., & Qi, Y. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b06001 · Cited by 593
Cai, Y., Xie, W., Ding, H., Chen, Y., Thirumal, K., Wong, L. H., Mathews, N., Mhaisalkar, S. G., Sherburne, M., & Asta, M. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02013 · Cited by 361
Self-citationGao, Z., Zhang, H., Mao, G., Ren, J., Chen, Z., Wu, C., Gates, I. D., Yang, W., Ding, X., & Yao, J. (2021) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150916 · Cited by 101
Kosasih, F. U., & Ducati, C. (2018) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.055 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakraborty, S., Xie, W., Mathews, N., Sherburne, M., Ahuja, R., Asta, M., & Mhaisalkar, S. G.
- Venue
- ACS Energy Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-03-17
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 837-845
- ISSN
- 2380-8195 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2592422623
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational Design: A High-Throughput Computational Screening and Experimental Validation Methodology for Lead-Free and Emergent Hybrid Perovskites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00035
- The paper
- Chakraborty, S., Xie, W., Mathews, N., Sherburne, M., Ahuja, R., Asta, M., & Mhaisalkar, S. G. (2017). Rational Design: A High-Throughput Computational Screening and Experimental Validation Methodology for Lead-Free and Emergent Hybrid Perovskites. ACS Energy Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.