Cited by 1Animal Disease Management and Epidemiologyvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesPoxvirus research and outbreaks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane Expression Enhances Folding, Multimeric Structure Formation, and Immunogenicity of Viral Capsid Proteins

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Viral capsid proteins are widely explored for subunit vaccine development but are often hampered by their complexity of production and low immunogenicity. Here, we report a simple approach to overcoming these challenges by combining mRNA vaccine technology with protein engineering. Using African swine fever virus (ASFV) capsid proteins P72 and penton as models, we engineered them into membrane-bound and secreted forms and compared their immunogenicity to that of the native intracellular form in mice and pigs through mRNA vaccination. The membrane-bound and secreted P72 and penton folded into their native multimeric structure independent of the viral chaperone, therefore preserving their conformational epitopes. The membrane-bound P72 and penton also elicited significantly stronger antibody and T cell responses than their secreted or intracellular counterparts. Our study provides a simple approach to enhancing folding, multimeric structure formation, and immunogenicity of viral capsid proteins for ASFV subunit vaccine development and immunogenicity of intracellular proteins in general.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c00067

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Parker J., 1969, Vet. Rec., 85, 668
  2. Thomson G. R., 1980, Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 47, 19
  3. 10.1016/S0378-1135(98)00187-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1099/0022-1317-82-3-513 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.052 · DOI
  6. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020140 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/14760584.2017.1306441 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/298347a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90772-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/viro.1999.0005 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.aaz1439 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.11.004 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/vaccines7020056 · DOI
  14. 10.3390/vaccines8030531 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/22221751.2022.2108342 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.11.011 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.01.004 · DOI
  18. 10.3390/vaccines7010012 · DOI
  19. 10.3389/fvets.2022.832255 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7221-7229.2001 · DOI
  21. 10.1128/JVI.01323-06 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.omtm.2018.12.009 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53956-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41422-019-0232-x · DOI
  25. 10.1128/jvi.70.12.8382-8390.1996 · DOI
  26. 10.1128/JVI.00781-08 · DOI
  27. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1126392 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.medj.2020.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1126/science.1523409 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1101/cshperspect.a033910 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.redox.2013.10.005 · DOI
  32. 10.1242/jcs.117218 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nrm1052 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/glycob/cwx036 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.020 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00152-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s007050050589 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/JVI.01557-09 · DOI
  40. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002754 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.01.022 · DOI
  42. 10.3390/vaccines5040042 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.09.016 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cui, J., Yuan, F., Qin, J., Jeon, J. H., Yun, D. S., Wang, T., Xu, R., Cao, H., Tungate, A. A., Netherton, C. L., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
  • Advanced RNA Vaccine Technologies, Inc., North Bethesda, Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
  • InnovHope, Inc.
  • The Pirbright Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Chen, Jianzhu
Venue
ACS Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-07-09
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
2104-2115
ISSN
2373-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412124559
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (P30-CA14051)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2024-67012-42721)
  • New Hope Group Singapore
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Keywords
capsid protein, membrane proteins, secreted proteins, protein folding, multimeric structure, immunogenicity, mRNA vaccination, subunit vaccine, African swine fever virus, protein engineering, antibody response, T cell response, pigs
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, African Swine Fever Virus, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Swine, Viral Vaccines, Protein Engineering, Protein Folding, Vaccines, Subunit, Capsid Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review