The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developments in Glycopeptide Antibiotics
Open accessAbstract
Glycopeptide antibiotics (GPAs) are a key weapon in the fight against drug resistant bacteria, with vancomycin still a mainstream therapy against serious Gram-positive infections more than 50 years after it was first introduced. New, more potent semisynthetic derivatives that have entered the clinic, such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, have superior pharmacokinetic and target engagement profiles that enable successful treatment of vancomycin-resistant infections. In the face of resistance development, with multidrug resistant (MDR) S. pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) together causing 20-fold more infections than all MDR Gram-negative infections combined, further improvements are desirable to ensure the Gram-positive armamentarium is adequately maintained for future generations. A range of modified glycopeptides has been generated in the past decade via total syntheses, semisynthetic modifications of natural products, or biological engineering. Several of these have undergone extensive characterization with demonstrated in vivo efficacy, good PK/PD profiles, and no reported preclinical toxicity; some may be suitable for formal preclinical development. The natural product monobactam, cephalosporin, and β-lactam antibiotics all spawned multiple generations of commercially and clinically successful semisynthetic derivatives. Similarly, next-generation glycopeptides are now technically well positioned to advance to the clinic, if sufficient funding and market support returns to antibiotic development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Ferraro, M. J. (2001) · Cited by 9,667
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility
Hiramatsu, K. (1997) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/40.1.135 · Cited by 1,984
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., & Levine, D. P. (2009) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp080434 · Cited by 1,795
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Cetinkaya, Y., Falk, P., & Mayhall, C. G. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.686 · Cited by 1,163
Levine, D. P. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/491709 · Cited by 838
The Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Vancomycin
Rybak, M. J. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/491712 · Cited by 774
Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Gardete, S., & Tomasz, A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci68834 · Cited by 565
Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Appelbaum, P. C., & Bozdogan, B. (2004) · Clinics in Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cll.2004.03.004 · Cited by 485
Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2002-2006
Sievert, D. M., Rudrik, J. T., Patel, J. B., McDonald, L. C., Wilkins, M. J., & Hageman, J. C. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/527392 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaskovich, M. A. T., Hansford, K. A., Butler, M. S., Jia, Z., Mark, A. E., & Cooper, M. A.
- Venue
- ACS Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 715-735
- ISSN
- 2373-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2785104789
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developments in Glycopeptide Antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00258
- The paper
- Blaskovich, M. A. T., Hansford, K. A., Butler, M. S., Jia, Z., Mark, A. E., & Cooper, M. A. (2018). Developments in Glycopeptide Antibiotics. ACS Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.