Mannosylation of LNP Results in Improved Potency for Self-Amplifying RNA (SAM) Vaccines
Open accessAbstract
Mannosylation of Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP) can potentially enhance uptake by Antigen Presenting Cells, which are highly abundant in dermal tissues, to improve the potency of Self Amplifying mRNA (SAM) vaccines in comparison to the established unmodified LNP delivery system. In the current studies, we evaluated mannosylated LNP (MLNP), which were obtained by incorporation of a stable Mannose-cholesterol amine conjugate, for the delivery of an influenza (hemagglutinin) encoded SAM vaccine in mice, by both intramuscular and intradermal routes of administration. SAM MLNP exhibited in vitro enhanced uptake in comparison to unglycosylated LNP from bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, and in vivo more rapid onset of the antibody response, independent of the route. The increased binding antibody levels also translated into higher functional hemagglutinin inhibition titers, particularly following intradermal administration. T cell assay on splenocytes from immunized mice also showed an increase in antigen specific CD8+ T responses, following intradermal administration of MLNP SAM vaccines. Induction of enhanced antigen specific CD4+ T cells, correlating with higher IgG2a antibody responses, was also observed. Hence, the present work illustrates the benefit of mannosylation of LNPs to achieve a faster immune response with SAM vaccines and these observations could contribute to the development of novel skin delivery systems for SAM vaccines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lipid nanoparticle-mRNA vaccines are being investigated as influenza vaccines, with some formulations in clinical trials.
“Lipid nanoparticle–mRNA vaccines are also being investigated as influenza vaccines29,41,156,157,159,184,189–191, with some formulations in clinical trials (Table 1).”
From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [191]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Goswami, R., Chatzikleanthous, D., Lou, G., Giusti, F., Bonci, A., Taccone, M., Brazzoli, M., Gallorini, S., Ferlenghi, I., Berti, F., O’Hagan, D. T., Pergola, C., Baudner, B. C., & Adamo, R.
- Affiliations
- GSK , Via Fiorentina 1 , ,
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baudner, Barbara C.
- Adamo, Roberto
- Venue
- ACS Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-07-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1546-1558
- ISSN
- 2373-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2960590558
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACS Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (675370)
- FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (316655)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- mannosylation, lipid nanoparticles, self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, influenza hemagglutinin, intradermal vaccination, dendritic cell uptake, antibody response, CD8+ T cell responses, CD4+ T cell responses, skin delivery, vaccine potency
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Cells, Cultured, Cholesterol, Dendritic Cells, Female, Immunoglobulin G, Influenza Vaccines, Injections, Intradermal, Mannose, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Particle Size, RNA, Messenger, Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review