Ultrasensitive and Highly Specific Lateral Flow Assays for Point-of-Care Diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
Lateral flow assays (LFAs) are paper-based point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools that are widely used because of their low cost, ease of use, and rapid format. Unfortunately, traditional commercial LFAs have significantly poorer sensitivities (μM) and specificities than standard laboratory tests (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA: pM-fM; polymerase chain reaction, PCR: aM), thus limiting their impact in disease control. In this Perspective, we review the evolving efforts to increase the sensitivity and specificity of LFAs. Recent work to improve the sensitivity through assay improvement includes optimization of the assay kinetics and signal amplification by either reader systems or additional reagents. Together, these efforts have produced LFAs with ELISA-level sensitivities (pM-fM). In addition, sample preamplification can be applied to both nucleic acids (direct amplification) and other analytes (indirect amplification) prior to LFA testing, which can lead to PCR-level (aM) sensitivity. However, these amplification strategies also increase the detection time and assay complexity, which inhibits the large-scale POC use of LFAs. Perspectives to achieve future rapid (<30 min), ultrasensitive (PCR-level), and "sample-to-answer" POC diagnostics are also provided. In the case of LFA specificity, recent research efforts have focused on high-affinity molecules and assay optimization to reduce nonspecific binding. Furthermore, novel highly specific molecules, such as CRISPR/Cas systems, can be integrated into diagnosis with LFAs to produce not only ultrasensitive but also highly specific POC diagnostics. In summary, with continuing improvements, LFAs may soon offer performance at the POC that is competitive with laboratory techniques while retaining a rapid format.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lateral-flow formats offer advantages in portability and ease of use, but they are generally less precise due to susceptibility to flow dynamics, operator variability, and lower analytical sensitivity.
“While lateral-flow formats offer advantages in portability and ease of use, they are generally less precise due to their susceptibility to flow dynamics, operator variability, and lower analytical sensitivity (41).”
From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity
Chen, J. S., Ma, E., Harrington, L. B., Da Costa, M., Tian, X., Palefsky, J. M., & Doudna, J. A. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6245 · Cited by 4,507 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wei, Y., Gu, M., Ren, Y., & Hu, Z. (2026) · Biomedical Reports · doi:10.3892/br.2026.2120 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“While lateral‑flow formats offer advantages in portability and ease of use, they are generally less precise due to their susceptibility to flow dynamics, operator variability, and lower analytical sensi‑ tivity (41).”
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Zhan, L., Qin, Z., Sackrison, J., & Bischof, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- 3984 Hunters Hill Way, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345, United States
- Corresponding author
- Bischof, John C.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-02-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3593-3611
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W3132888239
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 133 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 39
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Nano (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CBET- 2029474)
- Medtronic-Bakken Endowed Chair
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- lateral flow assay, point-of-care testing, assay sensitivity, assay specificity, signal amplification, nucleic acid amplification, CRISPR-Cas diagnostics, non-specific binding, rapid diagnostics, paper-based diagnostics
- MeSH terms
- Point-of-Care Testing, Biological Assay, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Nucleic Acids, Point-of-Care Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review