The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrabroadband and High-Detectivity Photodetector Based on WS2/Ge Heterojunction through Defect Engineering and Interface Passivation
Abstract
Broadband photodetectors are of great importance for numerous optoelectronic applications. Two-dimensional (2D) tungsten disulfide (WS 2 ), an important family member of transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), has shown great potential for high-sensitivity photodetection due to its extraordinary properties. However, the inherent large bandgap of WS 2 and the strong interface recombination impede the actualization of high-sensitivity broadband photodetectors. Here, we demonstrate the fabrication of an ultrabroadband WS 2 /Ge heterojunction photodetector through defect engineering and interface passivation. Thanks to the narrowed bandgap of WS 2 induced by the vacancy defects, the effective surface modification with an ultrathin AlO x layer, and the well-designed vertical n – n heterojunction structure, the WS 2 /AlO x /Ge photodetector exhibits an excellent device performance in terms of a high responsivity of 634.5 mA/W, a large specific detectivity up to 4.3 × 10 11 Jones, and an ultrafast response speed. Significantly, the device possesses an ultrawide spectral response spanning from deep ultraviolet (200 nm) to mid-wave infrared (MWIR) of 4.6 μm, along with a superior MWIR imaging capability at room temperature. The detection range has surpassed the WS 2 -based photodetectors in previous reports and is among the broadest for TMD-based photodetectors. Our work provides a strategy for the fabrication of high-performance ultrabroadband photodetectors based on 2D TMD materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Semimetals for high-performance photodetection
Liu, J., Xia, F., Xiao, D., García de Abajo, F. J., & Sun, D. (2020) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0715-7 · Cited by 326
Cited by
Wu, D., Guo, C., Zeng, L., Ren, X., Shi, Z., Wen, L., Chen, Q., Zhang, M., Li, X. J., Shan, C.-X., et al. (2023) · Light: Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-022-01047-5 · Cited by 404
Self-citationZeng, L., Han, W., Ren, X., Li, X., Wu, D., Liu, S., Wang, H., Lau, S. P., Tsang, Y. H., Shan, C.-X., et al. (2023) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02396 · Cited by 291
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, D., Guo, J., Wang, C., Ren, X., Chen, Y., Lin, P., Zeng, L., Shi, Z., Li, X. J., Shan, C.-X., & Jie, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-05-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 10119-10129
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W3165135849
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrabroadband and High-Detectivity Photodetector Based on WS2/Ge Heterojunction through Defect Engineering and Interface Passivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.1c02007
- The paper
- Wu, D., Guo, J., Wang, C., Ren, X., Chen, Y., Lin, P., Zeng, L., Shi, Z., Li, X. J., Shan, C.-X., & Jie, J. (2021). Ultrabroadband and High-Detectivity Photodetector Based on WS2/Ge Heterojunction through Defect Engineering and Interface Passivation. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.