The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrahigh-Volumetric-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with Lean Electrolyte Enabled by Cobalt-Doped MoSe2/Ti3C2Tx MXene Bifunctional Catalyst
Abstract
It is a significant challenge to design a dense high-sulfur-loaded cathode and meanwhile to acquire fast sulfur redox kinetics and suppress the heavy shuttling in the lean electrolyte, thus to acquire a high volumetric energy density without sacrificing gravimetric performance for realistic Li–S batteries (LSBs). Herein, we develop a cation-doping strategy to tailor the electronic structure and catalytic activity of MoSe 2 that in situ hybridized with conductive Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene, thus obtaining a Co-MoSe 2 /MXene bifunctional catalyst as a high-efficient sulfur host. Combining a smart design of the dense sulfur structure, the as-fabricated highly dense S/Co-MoSe 2 /MXene monolith cathode (density: 1.88 g cm –3, conductivity: 230 S m –1 ) achieves a high reversible specific capacity of 1454 mAh g –1 and an ultrahigh volumetric energy density of 3659 Wh L –1 at a routine electrolyte and a high areal capacity of ∼8.0 mAh cm –2 under an extremely lean electrolyte of 3.5 μL mg s –1 at 0.1 C. Experimental and DFT theoretical results uncover that introducing Co element into the MoSe 2 plane can form a shorter Co–Se bond, impel the Mo 3d band to approach the Fermi level, and provide strong interactions between polysulfides and Co-MoSe 2, thereby enhancing its intrinsic electronic conductivity and catalytic activity for fast redox kinetics and uniform Li 2 S nucleation in a dense high-sulfur-loaded cathode. This deep work provides a good strategy for constructing high-volumetric-energy-density, high-areal-capacity LSBs with lean electrolytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets
Chhowalla, M., Shin, H. S., Eda, G., Li, L.-J., Loh, K. P., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1589 · Cited by 10,034
Biomimetic Hydrogen Evolution: MoS 2 Nanoparticles as Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution
Hinnemann, B., Moses, P. G., Bonde, J., Jørgensen, K. P., Nielsen, J. H., Horch, S., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0504690 · Cited by 4,065
Li, N., Zhang, Y., Jia, M., Lv, X., Li, X., Li, R., Ding, X., Zheng, Y.-Z., & Tao, X. (2019) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134976 · Cited by 210
Cited by
Interface engineering toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries
Guo, Y., Niu, Q., Pei, F., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Du, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, L., et al. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee04183b · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Huai, L., Wu, S., Shan, J., Zhu, J., Liu, Z., Yue, L., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-07-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 11619-11633
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W3177977977
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.