Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrahigh-Volumetric-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with Lean Electrolyte Enabled by Cobalt-Doped MoSe2/Ti3C2Tx MXene Bifunctional Catalyst

Wang, Wei, Huai, Liyuan, Wu, Shangyou, Shan, Jiongwei, Zhu, Junlu, Liu, Zhonggang, Yue, Liguo, Li, Yunyong·2021·ACS Nano

Abstract

It is a significant challenge to design a dense high-sulfur-loaded cathode and meanwhile to acquire fast sulfur redox kinetics and suppress the heavy shuttling in the lean electrolyte, thus to acquire a high volumetric energy density without sacrificing gravimetric performance for realistic Li–S batteries (LSBs). Herein, we develop a cation-doping strategy to tailor the electronic structure and catalytic activity of MoSe 2 that in situ hybridized with conductive Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene, thus obtaining a Co-MoSe 2 /MXene bifunctional catalyst as a high-efficient sulfur host. Combining a smart design of the dense sulfur structure, the as-fabricated highly dense S/Co-MoSe 2 /MXene monolith cathode (density: 1.88 g cm –3, conductivity: 230 S m –1 ) achieves a high reversible specific capacity of 1454 mAh g –1 and an ultrahigh volumetric energy density of 3659 Wh L –1 at a routine electrolyte and a high areal capacity of ∼8.0 mAh cm –2 under an extremely lean electrolyte of 3.5 μL mg s –1 at 0.1 C. Experimental and DFT theoretical results uncover that introducing Co element into the MoSe 2 plane can form a shorter Co–Se bond, impel the Mo 3d band to approach the Fermi level, and provide strong interactions between polysulfides and Co-MoSe 2, thereby enhancing its intrinsic electronic conductivity and catalytic activity for fast redox kinetics and uniform Li 2 S nucleation in a dense high-sulfur-loaded cathode. This deep work provides a good strategy for constructing high-volumetric-energy-density, high-areal-capacity LSBs with lean electrolytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.1c02047

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Wang, W., Huai, L., Wu, S., Shan, J., Zhu, J., Liu, Z., Yue, L., & Li, Y.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2021-07-12
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
11619-11633
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W3177977977
Cited by
189
References
3
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.