Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mesoporous LixMn2O4Thin Film Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Pseudocapacitors

Lesel, Benjamin K., Ko, Jesse S., Dunn, Bruce, Tolbert, Sarah H.·2016·ACS Nano

Abstract

Charge storage devices with high energy density and enhanced rate capabilities are highly sought after in today's mobile world. Although several high-rate pseudocapacitive anode materials have been reported, cathode materials operating in a high potential range versus lithium metal are much less common. Here, we present a nanostructured version of the well-known cathode material, LiMn2O4. The reduction in lithium-ion diffusion lengths and improvement in rate capabilities is realized through a combination of nanocrystallinity and the formation of a 3-D porous framework. Materials were fabricated from nanoporous Mn3O4 films made by block copolymer templating of preformed nanocrystals. The nanoporous Mn3O4 was then converted via solid-state reaction with LiOH to nanoporous LixMn2O4 (1 < x < 2). The resulting films had a wall thickness of ∼15 nm, which is small enough to be impacted by inactive surface sites. As a consequence, capacity was reduced by about half compared to bulk LiMn2O4, but both charge and discharge kinetics as well as cycling stability were improved significantly. Kinetic analysis of the redox reactions was used to verify the pseudocapacitive mechanisms of charge storage and establish the feasibility of using nanoporous LixMn2O4 as a cathode in lithium-ion devices based on pseudocapacitive charge storage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.6b02608

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Lesel, B. K., Ko, J. S., Dunn, B., & Tolbert, S. H.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2016-08-10
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
7572-7581
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2489386913
Cited by
290
References
3
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.