Cited by 736Supercapacitor Materials and FabricationMXene and MAX Phase MaterialsDielectric materials and actuators

Highly Self-Healable 3D Microsupercapacitor with MXene–Graphene Composite Aerogel

Yue, Yang, Liu, Nishuang, Ma, Yanan, Wang, Siliang, Liu, Weijie, Luo, Cheng, Zhang, Hang, Cheng, Feng +4 more·2018·ACS Nano

Abstract

High-performance microsupercapacitors (MSCs) with three-dimensional (3D) structure provide an effective approach to improve the ability of energy storage. Because the electrodes with 3D structure are generally easily destroyed under mechanical deformation in practical applications, we fabricated a self-healable 3D MSC consisting of MXene (Ti 3 C 2 T x )-graphene (reduced graphene oxide, rGO) composite aerogel electrode by wrapping it with a self-healing polyurethane as an outer shell. The MXene-rGO composite aerogel combining large specific surface area of rGO and high conductivity of the MXene can not only prevent the self-restacking of the lamella structure but also resist the poor oxidization of MXene to a degree. The MSC based on a 3D MXene-rGO aerogel delivers a large area specific capacitance of 34.6 mF cm -2 at a scan rate of 1 mV s -1 and an outstanding cycling performance with a capacitance retention up to 91% over 15 000 cycles. The 3D MSC presents an excellent self-healing ability with specific capacitance retention of 81.7% after the fifth healing. The preparation of this self-healable 3D MSC can provide a method for designing and manufacturing next-generation long-life multifunctional electronic devices further to meet the requirements of sustainable development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.7b07528

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yue, Y., Liu, N., Ma, Y., Wang, S., Liu, W., Luo, C., Zhang, H., Cheng, F., Rao, J., Hu, X., Su, J., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Nishuang
  • Gao, Yihua
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2018-04-12
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
4224-4232
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2796574325
Cited by
736
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 29 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2016CFB432)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11674113)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › MXene and MAX Phase Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Dielectric materials and actuators
Keywords
micro-supercapacitors, self-healing, MXene, Ti3C2Tx, reduced graphene oxide, composite aerogels, three-dimensional electrodes, self-healing polyurethane, specific capacitance, cycling stability, mechanical deformation, energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review