The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticle Size and Coating Chemistry Control Foliar Uptake Pathways, Translocation, and Leaf-to-Rhizosphere Transport in Wheat
Open accessAbstract
Nanoenabled foliar-applied agrochemicals can potentially be safer and more efficient than conventional products. However, limited understanding about how nanoparticle properties influence their interactions with plant leaves, uptake, translocation through the mesophyll to the vasculature, and transport to the rest of the plant prevents rational design. This study used a combination of Au quantification and spatial analysis to investigate how size (3, 10, or 50 nm) and coating chemistry (PVP versus citrate) of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) influence these processes. Following wheat foliar exposure to AuNPs suspensions (∼280 ng per plant), adhesion on the leaf surface was increased for smaller sizes, and PVP-AuNPs compared to citrate-AuNPs. After 2 weeks, there was incomplete uptake of citrate-AuNPs with some AuNPs remaining on the outside of the cuticle layer. However, the fraction of citrate-AuNPs that had entered the leaf was translocated efficiently to the plant vasculature. In contrast, for similar sizes, virtually all of the PVP-AuNPs crossed the cuticle layer after 2 weeks, but its transport through the mesophyll cells was lower. As a consequence of PVP-AuNP accumulation in the leaf mesophyll, wheat photosynthesis was impaired. Regardless of their coating and sizes, the majority of the transported AuNPs accumulated in younger shoots (10-30%) and in roots (10-25%), and 5-15% of the NPs <50 nm were exuded into the rhizosphere soil. A greater fraction of larger sizes AuNPs (presenting lower ζ potentials) was transported to the roots. The key hypotheses about the NPs physical-chemical and plant physiology parameters that may matter to predict leaf-to-rhizosphere transport are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Küpper, H., Lombi, E., Zhao, F.-J., & McGrath, S. P. (2000) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s004250000366 · Cited by 685
Self-citationHeavy Metals in Crop Plants: Transport and Redistribution Processes on the Whole Plant Level
Page, V., & Feller, U. (2015) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy5030447 · Cited by 307
Cited by
Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution
Lowry, G. V., Avellan, A., & Gilbertson, L. M. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0461-7 · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationNanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook
Mittal, D., Kaur, G., Singh, P., Yadav, K., & Ali, S. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2020.579954 · Cited by 788
Nanoparticles in Plants: Uptake, Transport and Physiological Activity in Leaf and Root
Wang, X., Xie, H., Wang, P., & Yin, H. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16083097 · Cited by 518
Avellan, A., Yun, J., Morais, B. P., Clement, E. T., Rodrigues, S. M., & Lowry, G. V. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00178 · Cited by 412
Self-citationNanobiotechnology-based strategies for enhanced crop stress resilience
Zhao, L., Bai, T., Wei, H., Gardea-Torresdey, J. L., Keller, A., & White, J. C. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00596-7 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Avellan, A., Yun, J., Zhang, Y., Spielman-Sun, E., Unrine, J. M., Thieme, J., Li, J., Lombi, E., Bland, G., & Lowry, G. V.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-05-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5291-5305
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2944783552
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.