The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanistic Understanding of Metal Phosphide Host for Sulfur Cathode in High-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
For solving the drawbacks of low conductivity and the shuttle effect in a sulfur cathode, various nonpolar carbon and polar metal compounds with strong chemical absorption ability are applied as sulfur host materials for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Nevertheless, previous research simply attributed the performance improvement of sulfur cathodes to the chemical adsorption ability of polar metal compounds toward lithium polysulfides (LPS), while a deep understanding of the enhanced electrochemical performance in these various sulfur hosts, especially at the molecular levels, is still unclear. Herein, for a mechanistic understanding of superior metal phosphide host in Li–S battery chemistry, an integrated phosphide-based host of CF/FeP@C (carbon cloth with grown FeP@C nanotube arrays) is chosen as the model, and this binder-free cathode can exclude interference from the binder and conductive additives. With a systematic electrochemical investigation of the loading sulfur in such oxide- and phosphide-based hosts (CF/Fe 3 O 4 @C and CF/FeP@C), it is found that CF/FeP@C@S shows much superior Li–S performances. The greatly enhanced performance of CF/FeP@C@S suggests that FeP can well suppress the shuttle effect of LPS and accelerate their transformation during the charge–discharge process. The first-principles calculations reveal the performance variations of Fe 3 O 4 and FeP in Li–S batteries mainly because the shifts of the p band of the FeP could accelerate the interfacial electronics transfer dynamics by increasing the electronic concentration in the Fermi level of adsorbed Li 2 S 4 . The current work sheds light on the promising design of superior Li–S batteries from both theoretical and experimental aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multifunctional Transition Metal‐Based Phosphides in Energy‐Related Electrocatalysis
Li, Y., Dong, Z., & Jiao, L. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201902104 · Cited by 603
Shi, Y., Li, M., Yu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02577a · Cited by 426
Self-citationNg, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, J., Xu, X., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Li, F., Hu, R., Liu, J., Hou, X., Feng, Y., Yu, Y., & Zhu, M.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-07-29
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 8986-8996
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2966149426
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanistic Understanding of Metal Phosphide Host for Sulfur Cathode in High-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.9b02903
- The paper
- Shen, J., Xu, X., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Li, F., Hu, R., Liu, J., Hou, X., Feng, Y., Yu, Y., & Zhu, M. (2019). Mechanistic Understanding of Metal Phosphide Host for Sulfur Cathode in High-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b02903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.