Performance Study of Alkali-Activated Coal Gangue Powder-Based Geopolymer Flowable Solidified Soil
Open accessAbstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This study explores the use of alkali-activated coal gangue powder (CGP) as a sustainable stabilizer to improve loess performance, aiming to promote industrial solid waste valorization and low-carbon geotechnical construction. The effects of binder dosage on flowability, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and water stability were systematically evaluated, and microstructural mechanisms were examined by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results show that increasing binder dosage reduced the flowability and setting time while maintaining values above 160 mm, ensuring practical applicability. UCS increased with curing age and binder dosage, reaching 2.06 MPa at 28 days with rapid early strength development. Water stability was significantly enhanced, as no disintegration occurred after 24 h of immersion, and high-binder samples exhibited a buoyant mass increase 4.25 times that of low-binder samples, reflecting improved soil compactness and resistance to capillary water absorption. Microstructural analysis revealed that alkaline activation of CaO, SiO 2, and Al 2 O 3 promoted calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) gel formation, creating a stable spatial network that strengthened particle bonding and minimized porosity. These findings indicate that alkali-activated CGP can effectively stabilize soil for engineering applications, including road subgrades, foundation improvement, and embankments, providing both sustainable material utilization and reliable geotechnical performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Yu, S., Hu, A., Lu, L., Du, T., Yang, J., & Liu, H.
- Affiliations
- Longdong University (CN)
- Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Yang
- Venue
- ACS Omega
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-10-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 47928-47935
- ISSN
- 2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12547776
- OpenAlex
- W4415014366
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Omega (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Gansu Education Department (2024B-164, 2025B-209)
- Qingyang City (QY-STK-2024B-181)
- Gansu Province (JK2021-56)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Keywords
- geopolymer, loess stabilization, binder dosage, unconfined compressive strength, water stability, calcium silicate hydrate gel, microstructure, industrial solid waste valorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review