The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of Microbeads from Wastewater Using Electrocoagulation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The need for better microplastic removal from wastewater streams is clear, to prevent potential harm the microplastic may cause to the marine life. This paper aims to investigate the efficacy of electrocoagulation (EC), a well-known and established process, in the unexplored context of microplastic removal from wastewater streams. This premise was investigated using artificial wastewater containing polyethylene microbeads of different concentrations. The wastewater was then tested in a 1 L stirred-tank batch reactor. The effects of the wastewater characteristics (initial pH, NaCl concentration, and current density) on removal efficiency were studied. Microbead removal efficiencies in excess of 90% were observed in all experiments, thus suggesting that EC is an effective method of removing microplastic contaminants from wastewater streams. Electrocoagulation was found to be effective with removal efficiencies in excess of 90%, over pH values ranging from 3 to 10. The optimum removal efficiency of 99.24% was found at a pH of 7.5. An economic evaluation of the reactor operating costs revealed that the optimum NaCl concentration in the reactor is between 0 and 2 g/L, mainly due to the reduced energy requirements linked to higher water conductivity. In regard to the current density, the specific mass removal rate (kg/kWh) was the highest for the lowest tested current density of 11 A/m2, indicating that low current density is more energy efficient for microbead removal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trophic level transfer of microplastic: Mytilus edulis (L.) to Carcinus maenas (L.)
Farrell, P., & Nelson, K. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.046 · Cited by 1,507
Cited by
Removal of microplastics from the environment. A review
Padervand, M., Lichtfouse, E., Robert, D., & Wang, C. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-00983-1 · Cited by 759
Lapointe, M., Farner, J. M., Hernandez, L. M., & Tufenkji, N. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00712 · Cited by 470
Microplastics with adsorbed contaminants: Mechanisms and Treatment
Joo, S. H., Liang, Y., Kim, M., Byun, J., & Choi, H. (2021) · Environmental Challenges · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100042 · Cited by 363
Metal–organic framework-based foams for efficient microplastics removal
Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Y., Miao, C., Wang, Y.-R., Gao, G.-K., Yang, R.-X., Zhu, H.-J., Wang, J.-H., Li, S.-L., & Lan, Y.-Q. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta04891g · Cited by 298
Mayer, P. M., Moran, K. D., Miller, E. L., Brander, S. M., Harper, S., Garcia-Jaramillo, M., Carrasco-Navarro, V., Ho, K. T., Burgess, R. M., Thornton Hampton, L. M., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171153 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Perren, W., Wojtasik, A., & Cai, Q.
- Venue
- ACS Omega
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-03-20
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3357-3364
- ISSN
- 2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792529997
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Microbeads from Wastewater Using Electrocoagulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsomega.7b02037
- The paper
- Perren, W., Wojtasik, A., & Cai, Q. (2018). Removal of Microbeads from Wastewater Using Electrocoagulation. ACS Omega. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b02037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.