Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Study of Second-Harmonic Generation from Epsilon-Near-Zero Indium Tin Oxide and Titanium Nitride Nanolayers Excited in the Near-Infrared Spectral Range

Capretti, Antonio, Wang, Yu, Engheta, Nader, Dal Negro, Luca·2015·ACS Photonics

Abstract

We perform a comparative study of second-harmonic generation (SHG) from indium tin oxide (ITO) and from titanium nitride (TiN) nanolayers excited in the near-infrared spectrum. Both materials are compatible with Si technology and are candidate platforms for integrated nonlinear optics. In this work, we fabricate ITO samples with an ε-near-zero (ENZ) condition, which can be continuously tailored in the 1150–1670 nm spectral range, and TiN samples with a metallic behavior in the same spectral range. For the ITO nanolayers, we observe tunability and enhancement of the SHG intensity when the samples are excited at their respective ENZ condition, in agreement with the electromagnetic modeling and analogous to its third-harmonic generation studied earlier. On the other hand, we show that the SHG efficiency of TiN nanolayers is lower by a factor of 50. We determine experimentally that the dominant component of the second-order susceptibility for our best ITO nanolayer is χ zzz (2ω) = 0.18 pm V –1, and we theoretically predict that the SHG process is enhanced up to 4 orders of magnitude when resonantly pumping the nanolayer at the ENZ wavelength with respect to a wavelength at 2000 nm. Remarkably, the resulting SHG efficiency is comparable with a crystalline quartz plate with thickness 0.5 mm used as a reference in our experiments in reflection configuration. Our study clearly indicates that ITO nanolayers with engineered ENZ conditions are a promising material platform for surface nonlinearities, with possible applications to nonlinear metasurfaces, Si-based flat optics, and sensing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00355

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Capretti, A., Wang, Y., Engheta, N., & Dal Negro, L.
Venue
ACS Photonics
Published
2015-10-13
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
1584-1591
ISSN
2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2300046301
Cited by
198
References
3
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.