Cited by 116Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies

Visible Light Metasurfaces Based on Single-Crystal Silicon

Sell, David, Yang, Jianji, Doshay, Sage, Zhang, Kai, Fan, Jonathan A.·2016·ACS Photonics

Abstract

Semiconducting nanostructures are promising as components in high-performance metasurfaces. We show that single-crystal silicon can be used to realize efficient metasurface devices across the entire visible spectrum, ranging from 480 to 700 nm. Alternative forms of silicon, such as polycrystalline and amorphous silicon, suffer from higher absorption losses and do not yield efficient metasurfaces across this wavelength range. To demonstrate, we theoretically and experimentally characterize the resonant scattering peaks of individual single-crystal silicon nanoridges. In addition, we design high-efficiency metagratings and lenses based on nanoridge arrays, operating at visible wavelengths, using a stochastic optimization approach. We find that at wavelengths where single-crystal silicon is effectively lossless, devices based on high aspect ratio nanostructures are optimal. These devices possess efficiencies similar to those made of titanium oxide, which is an established material for high-efficiency visible wavelength metasurfaces. At blue wavelengths, where single-crystal silicon exhibits absorption losses, optimal devices are instead based on coupled low aspect ratio resonant nanostructures and are able to provide reasonably high efficiencies. We envision that crystalline silicon metasurfaces will enable compact optical systems spanning the full visible spectrum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00436

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For silicon, the dielectric properties strongly vary as the material ranges from amorphous to polycrystalline and monocrystalline.

    “For silicon, these dielectric properties strongly vary as the material ranges from amorphous to polycrystalline and monocrystalline [7].”

    From Robust design of topology-optimized metasurfaces (2019) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sell, D., Yang, J., Doshay, S., Zhang, K., & Fan, J. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Jonathan A.
Venue
ACS Photonics
Published
2016-10-07
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
1919-1925
ISSN
2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2524965405
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Photonics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Air Force (FA9550-15-1-0161)
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Keywords
monocrystalline silicon, metagratings, metalenses, stochastic optimization, absorption loss, resonant scattering, high aspect ratio nanostructures, blue light, compact optical system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review