Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plasmonic Cavity Coupling

Open access
Hugall, James T., Singh, Anshuman, van Hulst, Niek F.·2018·ACS Photonics

Abstract

The large losses of plasmonic nanocavities, orders of magnitude beyond those of photonic dielectric cavities, places them, perhaps surprisingly, as exceptional enhancers of single emitter light–matter interactions. The ultraconfined, sub-diffraction-limited mode volumes of plasmonic systems offer huge coupling strengths (in the 1–100 meV range) to single quantum emitters. Such strengths far outshine the coupling strengths of dielectric microcavities, which nonetheless easily achieve single emitter “strong coupling” due to the low loss rates of dielectric cavities. In fact, it is the much higher loss rate of plasmonic cavities that make them desirable for applications requiring bright, fast-emitting photon sources. Here we provide a simple method to reformulate lifetime measurements of single emitters in terms of coupling strengths to allow a useful comparison of the literature of plasmonic cavities with that of cavity-QED, typically more closely associated with dielectric cavities. Using this approach, we observe that the theoretical limit of coupling strength in plasmonic structures has almost been experimentally achieved with even single molecule strong coupling now observed in plasmonic systems. However, key problems remain to maximize the full potential of plasmonic cavities, including precise and deterministic nanopositioning of the emitter in the nanosized plasmonic mode volumes, understanding the best geometry for the plasmonic cavity, separating useful photons from background photons, and dealing with the fluorescence quenching problems of metals. Here we attempt to raise awareness of the benefits of plasmonic nanocavities for cavity-QED and tackle some of the potential pitfalls. We observe that there is increasing evidence that, by using correct geometries and improving emitter placement abilities, significant quenching can be avoided and photon output maximized toward the extraordinary limit provided by the high radiative rates of plasmonic nanocavities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01139

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Hugall, J. T., Singh, A., & van Hulst, N. F.
Venue
ACS Photonics
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
43-53
ISSN
2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783088304
Cited by
272
References
9
FWCI
12.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasmonic Cavity Coupling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01139
The paper
Hugall, J. T., Singh, A., & van Hulst, N. F. (2018). Plasmonic Cavity Coupling. ACS Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.