Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exciton–Plasmon Interaction between AuNPs/Graphene Nanohybrids and CdS Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Aptasensing of Prostate-Specific Antigen

Cai, Guoneng, Yu, Zhengzhong, Ren, Rongrong, Tang, Dianping·2018·ACS Sensors

Abstract

A competitive-displacement reaction strategy based on target-induced dissociation of gold nanoparticle coated graphene nanosheet (AuNPs/GN) from CdS quantum dot functionalized mesoporous titanium dioxide (CdS QDs/TiO 2 ) was designed for the sensitive photoelectrochemical (PEC) aptasensing of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) through the exciton–plasmon interaction (EPI) between CdS QDs and AuNPs. To construct such an aptasensing system, capture DNA was initially conjugated covalently onto CdS QDs/TiO 2 -modified electrode, and then AuNPs/GN-labeled PSA aptamer was bound onto biofunctionalized CdS QDs/TiO 2 via hybridization chain reaction of partial bases with capture DNA. Introduction of AuNPs/GN efficiently quenched the photocurrent of CdS QDs/TiO 2 thanks to energy transfer. Upon addition of target PSA, the sandwiched aptamer between CdS QDs/TiO 2 and AuNPs/GN reacted with the analyte analyte, thus resulting in the dissociation of AuNPs/GN from the CdS QDs/TiO 2 to increase the photocurrent. Under optimum conditions, the aptasensing platform exhibited a high sensitivity for PSA detection within a dynamic linear range of 1.0 pg/mL to 8.0 ng/mL at a low limitat of detection of 0.52 pg/mL. The interparticle distance of exciton–plasmon interaction and contents of AuNPs corresponding to EPI effect in this system were also studied. Good selectivity and high reproducibility were obtained for the analysis of target PSA. Importantly, the accuracy and matrix effect of PEC aptasensor was evaluated for the determination of human serum specimens and newborn calf serum-diluted PSA standards, giving a well-matched result with the referenced PSA ELISA kit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssensors.7b00899

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Cai, G., Yu, Z., Ren, R., & Tang, D.
Venue
ACS Sensors
Published
2018-02-21
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
632-639
ISSN
2379-3694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789180267
Cited by
408
References
0
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exciton–Plasmon Interaction between AuNPs/Graphene Nanohybrids and CdS Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Aptasensing of Prostate-Specific Antigen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssensors.7b00899
The paper
Cai, G., Yu, Z., Ren, R., & Tang, D. (2018). Exciton–Plasmon Interaction between AuNPs/Graphene Nanohybrids and CdS Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Aptasensing of Prostate-Specific Antigen. ACS Sensors. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00899

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.