The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exciton–Plasmon Interaction between AuNPs/Graphene Nanohybrids and CdS Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Aptasensing of Prostate-Specific Antigen
Abstract
A competitive-displacement reaction strategy based on target-induced dissociation of gold nanoparticle coated graphene nanosheet (AuNPs/GN) from CdS quantum dot functionalized mesoporous titanium dioxide (CdS QDs/TiO 2 ) was designed for the sensitive photoelectrochemical (PEC) aptasensing of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) through the exciton–plasmon interaction (EPI) between CdS QDs and AuNPs. To construct such an aptasensing system, capture DNA was initially conjugated covalently onto CdS QDs/TiO 2 -modified electrode, and then AuNPs/GN-labeled PSA aptamer was bound onto biofunctionalized CdS QDs/TiO 2 via hybridization chain reaction of partial bases with capture DNA. Introduction of AuNPs/GN efficiently quenched the photocurrent of CdS QDs/TiO 2 thanks to energy transfer. Upon addition of target PSA, the sandwiched aptamer between CdS QDs/TiO 2 and AuNPs/GN reacted with the analyte analyte, thus resulting in the dissociation of AuNPs/GN from the CdS QDs/TiO 2 to increase the photocurrent. Under optimum conditions, the aptasensing platform exhibited a high sensitivity for PSA detection within a dynamic linear range of 1.0 pg/mL to 8.0 ng/mL at a low limitat of detection of 0.52 pg/mL. The interparticle distance of exciton–plasmon interaction and contents of AuNPs corresponding to EPI effect in this system were also studied. Good selectivity and high reproducibility were obtained for the analysis of target PSA. Importantly, the accuracy and matrix effect of PEC aptasensor was evaluated for the determination of human serum specimens and newborn calf serum-diluted PSA standards, giving a well-matched result with the referenced PSA ELISA kit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon black as an outstanding and affordable nanomaterial for electrochemical (bio)sensor design
Arduini, F., Cinti, S., Mazzaracchio, V., Scognamiglio, V., Amine, A., & Moscone, D. (2020) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2020.112033 · Cited by 298
CRISPR-Driven Biosensors: A New Frontier in Rapid and Accurate Disease Detection
Razavi, Z., Soltani, M., Souri, M., & Pazoki-Toroudi, H. (2026) · Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/10408347.2024.2400267 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, G., Yu, Z., Ren, R., & Tang, D.
- Venue
- ACS Sensors
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-02-21
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 632-639
- ISSN
- 2379-3694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789180267
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exciton–Plasmon Interaction between AuNPs/Graphene Nanohybrids and CdS Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Aptasensing of Prostate-Specific Antigen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssensors.7b00899
- The paper
- Cai, G., Yu, Z., Ren, R., & Tang, D. (2018). Exciton–Plasmon Interaction between AuNPs/Graphene Nanohybrids and CdS Quantum Dots/TiO2 for Photoelectrochemical Aptasensing of Prostate-Specific Antigen. ACS Sensors. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.