Chemical Binder-Free and Oven-Dried Lignocellulose/Clay Composite Foams: Flame Resistance, Thermal Insulation, and Recyclability
Abstract
Global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and improve thermal comfort demand sustainable and safe-to-use insulative materials. This study advances a new type of chemical binder-free lignocellulose/clay composite foam as a sustainable alternative to the currently used synthetic and glass/mineral counterparts. Pressurized disk milling unraveled submicron “hairy” fibrillation on the surface of refiner mechanical pulp (RMP). Such fibrillated fibers were then subjected to a foam laying process, with kaolinite being incorporated as an efficient and cost-effective fire retardant. Upon oven drying, the foams display suitable structural and mechanical robustness. Through mild fibrillation treatment of the RMP, a clay retention of up to 2-fold by weight was achieved without compromising the properties of the foam, removing the need for the addition of chemical binders. The foam density, mechanical and thermal properties, and flame resistance were systematically investigated with respect to the relative fiber loading as well as surfactant and clay addition. A low thermal conductivity (43.7 ± 0.7 mW/(m·K)) and high flame resistance (limiting oxygen index of ∼43%) were demonstrated for hybrid foams of apparent density of 136 ± 1 kg/m 3 that also displayed good compressive strength (Young’s modulus of 0.805 ± 0.158 MPa and compressive stress of 0.126 ± 0.008 MPa at 25% strain). Remarkably, owing to the absence of chemical binding, facile recyclability was demonstrated over three cycles, with no significant reduction in performance. Overall, this work proposes a readily scalable technology toward safe-to-use, recyclable lignocellulose/clay composite foams for building insulation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nielsen-Roine, K., Semple, K. E., Mokarizadehhaghighishirazi, M., Meyboom, A., & Dai, C. (2026) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-026-03543-3
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Zhu, J., Li, Y., Chen, J., Rojas, O., & Jiang, F.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Rojas, Orlando
- Jiang, Feng
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-11-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 16499-16508
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388498464
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Foundation for Innovation (37517, 38623)
- Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (22/23-UBC-TI-W23-046)
- Canada Research Chairs (231928)
- Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada (CERC-2018-00006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Material Properties and Processing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
- Keywords
- kaolinite, flame retardants, thermal insulation, thermal conductivity, flame resistance, recyclability, building insulation, surfactants, compressive strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review