Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LignoForce System for the Recovery of Lignin from Black Liquor: Feedstock Options, Odor Profile, and Product Characterization

Kouisni, Lamfeddal, Gagné, Alain, Maki, Kirsten, Holt-Hindle, Peter, Paleologou, Michael·2016·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

Lignin can be precipitated from kraft black liquor (BL) through the addition of an acidifying agent such as carbon dioxide or sulfuric acid. In most of the existing lignin precipitation processes that are using acid addition, sufficient acid is added to drop the pH of the black liquor from about 13–14 to about 9–10, followed by lignin particle coagulation, lignin slurry filtration, and lignin cake washing with sulfuric acid and water. At pH values of less than 11, the potential exists for the generation of significant quantities of totally reduced sulfur (TRS) compounds and other volatile sulfur species. Such compounds which include hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, and dimethyl disulfide are strongly odorous compounds with well-known negative effects on human health and other forms of life. To address this problem, as well as other problems associated with existing lignin recovery processes, FPInnovations and Noram recently developed a new process called the LignoForce System. This process employs a black liquor oxidation step to convert TRS compounds present in kraft black liquor to nonvolatile species. This paper discusses the applicability of the LignoForce System to several feedstock black liquors (e.g., softwood, hardwood, and eucalyptus) as well as the sulfur compound outgassing potential from various stages of this process compared to a reference case in which the black liquor was not oxidized. In addition, the emission of volatile sulfur and organic compounds from the two lignin products at different temperatures is discussed and compared.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00907

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Kouisni, L., Gagné, A., Maki, K., Holt-Hindle, P., & Paleologou, M.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
5152-5159
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514423992
Cited by
172
References
1
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LignoForce System for the Recovery of Lignin from Black Liquor: Feedstock Options, Odor Profile, and Product Characterization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00907
The paper
Kouisni, L., Gagné, A., Maki, K., Holt-Hindle, P., & Paleologou, M. (2016). LignoForce System for the Recovery of Lignin from Black Liquor: Feedstock Options, Odor Profile, and Product Characterization. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00907

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.