The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Grown AgI/Bi12O17Cl2 Heterojunction Photocatalysts for Visible Light Degradation of Sulfamethazine: Efficiency, Pathway, and Mechanism
Abstract
Visible-light-driven photocatalysts attract great interest because they can utilize more sunlight for reactions than conventional photocatalysts. A novel visible-light-driven photocatalyst AgI/Bismuth oxychloride (Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2 ) hybrid was synthesized by a hydrothermal-precipitation method. Several characterization tools, such as X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) were employed to study the phase structures, morphologies, and optical properties of the fabricated photocatalysts. These characterizations indicated that AgI nanoparticles were evenly distributed on the surface of Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2, and heterostructures were formed. The photochemical characterizations demonstrated that the promoted separation of carrier transfer in the AgI/Bi 12 O 17 C l2 heterojunction was achieved. The degradation rate of sulfamethazine (SMZ) by AgI/Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2 was about 7.8 times and 35.2 times higher than that of pristine Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2 and BiOCl under visible-light-driven photocatalysts, respectively. It was also found that the amount of AgI in the AgI/Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2 composites played an important role in photocatalytic activity, and the optimized ratio was 25%. The AgI/Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2 shows good catalytic stability and maintains similar reactivity after four cycles. Furthermore, the degradation intermediates of SMZ were identified by HPLC-MS, and the photocatalytic mechanism was proposed. These findings highlight the role of Bi 12 O 17 Cl 2 on contaminant elimination and open avenues for the rational design of highly efficient photocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gong, J.-L., Wang, B., Zeng, G.-M., Yang, C.-P., Niu, C.-G., Niu, Q.-Y., Zhou, W.-J., & Liang, Y. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.072 · Cited by 1,057
Self-citation
Cited by
Yang, Y., Zeng, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, D., Zeng, G., Xiao, R., Lai, C., Zhou, C., Guo, H., Xue, W., et al. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.093 · Cited by 691
Self-citationNguyen, C. H., Fu, C.-C., & Juang, R.-S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.110 · Cited by 594
Yang, Y., Zhang, C., Lai, C., Zeng, G., Huang, D., Cheng, M., Wang, J., Chen, F., Zhou, C., & Xiong, W. (2018) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2018.03.004 · Cited by 544
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, C., Lai, C., Xu, P., Zeng, G., Huang, D., Zhang, C., Cheng, M., Hu, L., Wan, J., Liu, Y., Xiong, W., Deng, Y., & Wen, M.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-01-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4174-4184
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2783404851
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Grown AgI/Bi12O17Cl2 Heterojunction Photocatalysts for Visible Light Degradation of Sulfamethazine: Efficiency, Pathway, and Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04584
- The paper
- Zhou, C., Lai, C., Xu, P., Zeng, G., Huang, D., Zhang, C., Cheng, M., Hu, L., Wan, J., Liu, Y., Xiong, W., Deng, Y., & Wen, M. (2018). In Situ Grown AgI/Bi12O17Cl2 Heterojunction Photocatalysts for Visible Light Degradation of Sulfamethazine: Efficiency, Pathway, and Mechanism. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.