Quantification of interlaboratory cell-free protein synthesis variability
Abstract
Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) platforms, once primarily a research tool to produce difficult to express proteins, are increasingly being pursued by the synthetic biology community for applications including biomanufacturing, rapid screening systems, and field-ready sensors. While consistency within individual studies is apparent in the literature, challenges with reproducing results between laboratories, or even between individuals within a laboratory, are discussed openly by practitioners. As the field continues to grow and move toward applications, a quantitative understanding of expected variability for CFPS and the relative contribution of underlying sources will become increasingly important. Here we offer the first quantitative assessment of interlaboratory variability in CFPS. Three laboratories implemented a single CFPS protocol and performed a series of exchanges, both of material and personnel, designed to quantify relative contributions to variability associated with the site, operator, cell extract preparation, and supplemental reagent preparation. We found that materials prepared at each laboratory, exchanged pairwise, and tested at each site resulted in 40.3% coefficient of variation compared to 7.64% for a single operator across days using a single set of materials. Reagent preparations contributed significantly to observed variability; extract preparations, however, surprisingly did not explain any of the observed variability, even when prepared in differ…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In cell-free systems, reagent preparation and site-specific factors can substantially influence experimental variability.
“For instance, impurities in the surfactant Poloxamer 188 have been shown to induce cytostatic effects and atypical cell culture performance during monoclonal antibody production (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2022), while inter-laboratory studies in cell-free systems demonstrate that reagent preparation and site-specific factors can substantially influence experimental variability (Cole et al., 2019).”
From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Cole et al., 2019
Cites
<b>lmerTest</b> Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · Cited by 24,346 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morató, A., Elena-Real, C. A., Popovic, M., Fournet, A., Zhang, K., Allemand, F., Sibille, N., Urbanek, A., & Bernadó, P. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10101458 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Spänle, J. V., Haiber, L. M., & Seeger, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2026.1800157 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cole, S. D., Beabout, K., Turner, K. B., Smith, Z. K., Funk, V. L., Harbaugh, S. V., Liem, A. T., Roth, P. A., Geier, B. A., Emanuel, P. A., Walper, S. A., Chávez, J. L., & Lux, M. W.
- Affiliations
- US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center. 8198 Blackhawk Road, APG, Maryland 21010, United States
- UES, Inc., Dayton, Ohio 45432, United States
- Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue SW, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States
- Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433, United States
- DCS Corporation, 100 Walter Ward Blvd, Suite 100, Abingdon, Maryland 21009, United States
- Venue
- ACS Synthetic Biology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-08-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2080-2091
- ISSN
- 2161-5063
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Office of the Secretary of Defense
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review