Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 551

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing Graphene-TiO2 Nanowire and Graphene-TiO2 Nanoparticle Composite Photocatalysts

Pan, Xuan, Zhao, Yong, Liu, Shu, Korzeniewski, Carol L., Wang, Shu, Fan, Zhaoyang·2012·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

We demonstrate that uniform dispersion of TiO(2) on graphene is critical for the photocatalytic effect of the composite. The hydrothermal method was employed to synthesize TiO(2) nanowires (NW) and then fabricate graphene-TiO(2) nanowire nanocomposite (GNW). Graphene oxide (GO) reduction to graphene and hybridization between TiO(2) NWs and graphene by forming chemical bonding was achieved in a one-step hydrothermal process. Graphene-TiO(2) nanoparticle (NP) nanocomposite (GNP) was also synthesized. Photocatalytic performance and related properties of NP, NW, GNP, and GNW were comparatively studied. It was found that by incorporation of graphene, GNP and GNW have higher performance than their counterparts. More importantly, it was found that NWs, in comparison with NPs, have more uniform dispersion on graphene with less agglomeration, resulting in more direct contact between TiO(2) and graphene, and hence further improved electron-hole pairs (EHPs) separation and transportation. The adsorbability of GNW is also found to be higher than GNP. The result reveals that the relative photocatalytic activity of GNW is much higher than GNP and pure NWs or NPs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/am300772t

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 551

Metadata

Authors
Pan, X., Zhao, Y., Liu, S., Korzeniewski, C. L., Wang, S., & Fan, Z.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2012-07-20
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
3944-3950
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2470489246
Cited by
551
References
2
FWCI
15.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.