The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significant Different Conductivities of the Two Grades of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):Poly(styrenesulfonate), Clevios P and Clevios PH1000, Arising from Different Molecular Weights
Abstract
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) is promising to be the next-generation transparent electrode of optoelectronic devices. This paper reports the differences between two commercially available grades of PEDOT:PSS: Clevios P and Clevios PH1000. The as-prepared PEDOT:PSS films from Clevios P and Clevios PH1000 solutions have close conductivities of 0.2-0.35 S cm(-1). Their conductivities can be enhanced to 171 and 1164 S cm(-1), respectively, through a treatment with hydrofluoroacetone trihydrate (HFA). The differences between Clevios P and Clevios PH1000 were studied by various characterizations on PEDOT:PSS aqueous solutions and PEDOT:PSS films. The gel particles are larger in Clevios PH1000 solution than in Clevios P solution as revealed by dynamic light scattering and fluorescence spectroscopy of pyrene in these solutions. These results suggest that PEDOT of Clevios PH1000 has a higher average molecular weight than that of Clevios P. The difference in the molecular weight of PEDOT for the two grades of PEDOT:PSS is confirmed by the characterizations on their polymer films, including atomic force microscopy and temperature dependences of the resistances of as-prepared and HFA-treated PEDOT:PSS films. The different molecular weights of PEDOT also gives rise to significant differences in the electrochemical behaviors of the two grades of PEDOT:PSS, as revealed by the cyclic voltammetry, in situ UV-vis-NIR absorption spectroscopy and potentiostatic transient measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Silver nanowire-polymer composite electrodes for efficient polymer solar cells
Yu, Z., Li, L., Zhang, Q., Hu, W., & Pei, Q. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201101992 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Thermoelectric Properties of PEDOT:PSS
Fan, Z., & Ouyang, J. (2019) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.201800769 · Cited by 448
Self-citationAlemu Mengistie, D., Wang, P.-C., & Chu, C.-W. (2013) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c3ta11726j · Cited by 316
Ouyang, J. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am404113n · Cited by 296
Self-citationElastic conducting polymer composites in thermoelectric modules
Kim, N., Lienemann, S., Petsagkourakis, I., Alemu Mengistie, D., Kee, S., Ederth, T., Gueskine, V., Leclère, P., Lazzaroni, R., Crispin, X., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15135-w · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, Y., & Ouyang, J.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-07-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4131-4140
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2331919107
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significant Different Conductivities of the Two Grades of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):Poly(styrenesulfonate), Clevios P and Clevios PH1000, Arising from Different Molecular Weights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/am300881m
- The paper
- Xia, Y., & Ouyang, J. (2012). Significant Different Conductivities of the Two Grades of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):Poly(styrenesulfonate), Clevios P and Clevios PH1000, Arising from Different Molecular Weights. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300881m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.