The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ferroferric Oxide/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube vs Polyaniline/Ferroferric Oxide/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Multiheterostructures for Highly Effective Microwave Absorption
Abstract
Light-weight nanocomposites filled with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are developed for their significant potentials in electromagnetic shielding and attenuation for wide applications in electronics, communication devices, and specific parts in aircrafts and vehicles. Specifically, the introduction of a second phase into/onto CNTs for achieving CNT-based heterostructures has been widely pursued due to the enhancement in either dielectric loss or magnetic loss. In this work, ferroferric oxide (Fe(3)O(4)) was selected as the phase in multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)-based composites for enhancing magnetic properties to obtain improved electromagnetic attenuation. A direct comparison between the two-phase heterostructures (Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs) and polyaniline (PANI) coated Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs, namely, three-phase heterostructures (PANI/Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs), was made to investigate the interface influences of Fe(3)O(4) and PANI on the complex permittivity and permeability separately. Compared to PANI/Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs, Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs exhibited enhanced magnetic properties coupled with increased dielectric properties. Interfaces between MWCNTs and heterostructures were found to play a role in the corresponding properties. The evaluation of microwave absorption of their wax composites was carried out, and the comparison between Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs and PANI/Fe(3)O(4)/MWCNTs with respect to highly efficient microwave absorption and effective absorption bandwidth was discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Xia, Y., Gao, W., & Gao, C. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202204591 · Cited by 734
Wang, L., Huang, Y., Sun, X., Huang, H., Liu, P., Zong, M., & Wang, Y. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c3nr05313j · Cited by 429
Yang, W., Zhao, Z., Wu, K., Huang, R., Liu, T., Jiang, H., Chen, F., & Fu, Q. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c7tc00400a · Cited by 363
Progress in microwave absorbing materials: A critical review
Sharma, S., Parne, S. R., Panda, S. S. S., & Gandi, S. (2024) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103143 · Cited by 291
Wan, Y.-J., Zhu, P.-L., Yu, S.-H., Sun, R., Wong, C.-P., & Liao, W.-H. (2017) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.054 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, M.-S., Yang, J., Song, W.-L., Zhang, D.-Q., Wen, B., Jin, H.-B., Hou, Z.-L., & Yuan, J.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-11-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6949-6956
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2025191013
- Cited by
- 899
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ferroferric Oxide/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube vs Polyaniline/Ferroferric Oxide/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Multiheterostructures for Highly Effective Microwave Absorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/am3021069
- The paper
- Cao, M.-S., Yang, J., Song, W.-L., Zhang, D.-Q., Wen, B., Jin, H.-B., Hou, Z.-L., & Yuan, J. (2012). Ferroferric Oxide/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube vs Polyaniline/Ferroferric Oxide/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Multiheterostructures for Highly Effective Microwave Absorption. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/am3021069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
