The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical Capacitance of Ni-Doped Metal Organic Framework and Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites: More than the Sum of Its Parts
Abstract
Composites of a Ni-doped metal organic framework (MOF) with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are synthesized in bulk (gram scale) quantities. The composites are composed of rGO sheets, which avoid restacking from the physical presence of MOF crystals. At larger concentration of rGO, the MOF crystals are distributed on the overlapping and continuous rGO sheets. Ni in Ni-doped MOF is found to engage in a two-electron, reversible, efficient, redox reaction shuttling between Ni and Ni(OH)2 in aqueous potassium hydroxide (KOH) electrolyte. The reaction is rather unique as Ni-based supercapacitors use a one-electron transfer Faradaic redox reaction between Ni(OH)2 and NiO(OH). Employing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, we determined the charge transfer resistance to be 184 mΩ for MOF, 74 mΩ for a Ni-doped MOF and 6 mΩ for a rGO-Ni-doped MOF composite, but these modifications do not affect the mass transfer resistance. This novel redox reaction in conjunction with the lowered charge transfer resistance from the introduction of rGO underpins the synergy that dramatically increases the capacitance to 758 F/g in the rGO-Ni-doped MOF composite, when the parent MOF could store only 100 F/g and a physical composite of rGO and Ni-doped MOF could algebraically achieve about 240 F/g. A generic approach of doping MOFs with a redox active metal and forming a composite with rGO transforms an electro-inactive MOF to high capacity energy storage material with energy density of 37.8 Wh/kg at a power density of 227 W/kg. These results can promote the development of high-performance energy storage materials from the wide family of MOFs available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ni(OH) 2 Nanoplates Grown on Graphene as Advanced Electrochemical Pseudocapacitor Materials
Wang, H., Casalongue, H. S., Liang, Y., & Dai, H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja102267j · Cited by 2,042
Cited by
Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks as active materials for supercapacitors
Wang, K.-B., Xun, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100025 · Cited by 474
Rahmanifar, M. S., Hesari, H., Noori, A., Masoomi, M. Y., Morsali, A., & Mousavi, M. F. (2018) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.130 · Cited by 389
Sundriyal, S., Shrivastav, V., Kaur, H., Mishra, S., & Deep, A. (2018) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b02065 · Cited by 361
Boorboor Ajdari, F., Kowsari, E., Niknam Shahrak, M., Ehsani, A., Kiaei, Z., Torkzaban, H., Ershadi, M., Kholghi Eshkalak, S., Haddadi-Asl, V., Chinnappan, A., et al. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213441 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Banerjee, P. C., Lobo, D. E., Middag, R., Ng, W. K., Shaibani, M. E., & Majumder, M.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-02-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3655-3664
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2005786323
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.