The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biological Reactions
Abstract
This review considers the author perspective on the emergence of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of biological processes. It starts with the 1976 simulation of the primary event in rhodopsin, moves to the earliest simulations of enzymatic reactions and electron transfer reactions and ends up with recent simulations of proton translocations and ion transport in proteins. The emphasis is placed on our progress in simulations of actual biological reactions and functional properties, rather than on studies of general properties such as structure and thermal motions. In most cases it has been possible to develop special strategies that capture the relevant dynamics of the given biological process. The predictive power of our early simulations of fast biological process (e.g. vision and photosynthesis) and the insight obtained from these studies is pointed out. Critical examinations of dynamical effects in different biological processes is reviewed. This includes the finding that dynamical effects are unlikely to contribute significantly to enzyme catalysis or to other processes with significant activation barriers. Even in the case of ion channels it is found that the most important effects are associated with energetics rather than dynamics. Nevertheless, MD simulations provide what is probably the most realistic description of the actual reactive events. The resulting insight is crucial in studies of fast photobiological reactions and instructive in cases of slower processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness
Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.77 · Cited by 1,138
Cited by
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Stein, T., Kronik, L., & Baer, R. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8087482 · Cited by 870
Levine, R. D. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614125 · Cited by 709
Gitlin, I., Carbeck, J. D., & Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200502530 · Cited by 286
Multiscale Modeling of Biological Functions: From Enzymes to Molecular Machines (Nobel Lecture)
Warshel, A. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201403689 · Cited by 245
“While the MD studies of ultrafast photobiological processes of the type discussed above have been very effective [55], the simulations of functional properties that involve longer time steps and larger systems have presented a much more serious challenge.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Warshel, A.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-04-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 385-395
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W1978101105
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biological Reactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar010033z
- The paper
- Warshel, A. (2002). Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biological Reactions. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar010033z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.