Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Attractive Intramolecular Edge-to-Face Aromatic Interactions in Flexible Organic Molecules

Jennings, W. Brian, Farrell, Brid M., Malone, John F.·2001·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Recent X-ray crystallographic and NMR evidence indicates that relatively weak intramolecular edge-to-face interactions between aromatic rings can affect or determine the conformation of organic molecules in the solid state and in solution. Experimental estimates indicate that these interactions are energetically attractive by ca. 1.5 kcal mol(-1) but disfavored in solution by entropic factors due to the restricted internal mobility. Hence, these interactions are more manifest at low temperature in solution or in crystal structures where conformational entropy effects are negligible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar0100475

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jennings, W. B., Farrell, B. M., & Malone, J. F.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2001-10-10
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
885-894
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2057547754
Cited by
409
References
0
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.