Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Poly(p-phenyleneethynylene)s by Alkyne Metathesis

Bunz, Uwe H. F.·2001·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Alkyne metathesis was effected by mixtures of Mo(CO)(6) and phenols at elevated temperatures based on an improved version of the method reported by Mortreux and Mori. When propynylated arenes are subjected to these reaction conditions, the formation of diarylalkynes is often quantitative and likewise allows the synthesis of alkyne-bridged macrocycles and polymers of high molecular weight. Alkyne metathesis made high-molecular weight poly[p-(dialkylphenylene)ethynylene]s (PPEs) accessible that show promise as active layers in organic semiconductor devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar010092c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bunz, U. H. F.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2001-11-13
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
998-1010
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W1987460080
Cited by
281
References
0
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.