The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Chain-Length Dependence Test
Abstract
Trends obtained from systematic studies based on chain-length variation have provided valuable insight and understanding into the behavior of m-phenylene ethynylene foldamers. The generalization of this experimental approach, the chain-length dependence test, is useful for studying solution conformation, packing in the solid state, specific intrachain interactions, and the contributions of end groups to a particular property.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ordered porous materials for emerging applications
Davis, M. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00785 · Cited by 5,308
Cited by
Hua, Y., & Flood, A. H. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b818033b · Cited by 631
Flipping the Switch on Chloride Concentrations with a Light-Active Foldamer
Hua, Y., & Flood, A. H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja105793c · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, M. T., Heemstra, J. M., & Moore, J. S.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-10-29
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2159446531
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
