Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Peptide Interactions with Metal and Oxide Surfaces

Vallee, Anne, Humblot, Vincent, Pradier, Claire-Marie·2010·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Increasing interest in bio-interfaces for medical, diagnostic, or biotechnology applications has highlighted the critical scientific challenge behind both the understanding and control of protein-solid surface interactions. In this context, this Account focuses on the molecular-level characterization of the interactions of peptides, ranging in size from a few amino acids to long sequences, with metal and oxide surfaces. In this Account, we attempt to fill the gap between the well-known basic studies of the interaction of a single amino acid with well-defined metal surfaces and the investigations aimed at controlling biocompatibility or biofilm growth processes. We gather studies performed with surface science tools and macroscopic characterization techniques along with those that use modeling methods, and note the trends that emerge. Sulfur drives the interaction of cysteine-containing peptides with metal surfaces, particularly gold. Moreover, intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonds may induce surface self assembly and chiral arrangements of the peptide layer. Depending on the solvent pH and composition, carboxylates or amino groups may also interact with the surface, which could involve conformational changes in the adsorbed peptide. On oxide surfaces such as titania or silica, researchers have identified carboxylate groups as the preferential peptide binding groups because of their strong electrostatic interactions with the charged surface. In high molecular weight peptides, systematic studies of their interaction with various oxide surfaces point to the preferential interaction of certain peptide sequences: basic residues such as arginine assume a special role. Researchers have successfully used these observations to synthesize adhesive sequences and initiate biomineralization. Studies of the interaction of peptides with nanoparticles have revealed similar binding trends. Sulfur-containing peptides adhere preferentially to gold nanoparticles. Peptides containing aromatic nitrogen also display a high affinity for various inorganic nanoparticles. Finally, we describe a novel class of peptides, genetically engineered peptides for inorganics (GEPIs), which are selected from a phage display protocol for their high binding affinity for inorganic surfaces. Extended investigations have focused on the mechanisms of the molecular binding of these peptides to solid surfaces, in particular the high binding affinity of some sulfur-free sequences of GEPIs to gold or platinum surfaces. We expect that this clearer view of the possible preferential interactions between peptides and inorganic surfaces will facilitate the development of new, more focused research in various fields of biotechnology, such as biocompatibility, biomimetics, or tissue engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar100017n

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Vallee, A., Humblot, V., & Pradier, C.-M.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
1297-1306
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2042060162
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptide Interactions with Metal and Oxide Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar100017n
The paper
Vallee, A., Humblot, V., & Pradier, C.-M. (2010). Peptide Interactions with Metal and Oxide Surfaces. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar100017n

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.