The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Redox Potentials and Acidity Constants from Density Functional Theory Based Molecular Dynamics
Open accessAbstract
CONSPECTUS: All-atom methods treat solute and solvent at the same level of electronic structure theory and statistical mechanics. All-atom computation of acidity constants (pKa) and redox potentials is still a challenge. In this Account, we review such a method combining density functional theory based molecular dynamics (DFTMD) and free energy perturbation (FEP) methods. The key computational tool is a FEP based method for reversible insertion of a proton or electron in a periodic DFTMD model system. The free energy of insertion (work function) is computed by thermodynamic integration of vertical energy gaps obtained from total energy differences. The problem of the loss of a physical reference for ionization energies under periodic boundary conditions is solved by comparing with the proton work function computed for the same supercell. The scheme acts as a computational hydrogen electrode, and the DFTMD redox energies can be directly compared with experimental redox potentials. Consistent with the closed shell nature of acid dissociation, pKa estimates computed using the proton insertion/removal scheme are found to be significantly more accurate than the redox potential calculations. This enables us to separate the DFT error from other sources of uncertainty such as finite system size and sampling errors. Drawing an analogy with charged defects in solids, we trace the error in redox potentials back to underestimation of the energy gap of the extended states of the solvent. Accordingly the improvement in the redox potential as calculated by hybrid functionals is explained as a consequence of the opening up of the bandgap by the Hartree-Fock exchange component in hybrids. Test calculations for a number of small inorganic and organic molecules show that the hybrid functional implementation of our method can reproduce acidity constants with an uncertainty of 1-2 pKa units (0.1 eV). The error for redox potentials is in the order of 0.2 V.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kühne, T. D., Iannuzzi, M., Del Ben, M., Rybkin, V. V., Seewald, P., Stein, F., Laino, T., Khaliullin, R. Z., Schütt, O., Schiffmann, F., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0007045 · Cited by 4,468
Self-citationElectrocatalysis for CO 2 conversion: from fundamentals to value-added products
Wang, G., Chen, J., Ding, Y., Cai, P., Yi, L., Li, Y., Tu, C., Hou, Y., Wen, Z., & Dai, L. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00071j · Cited by 1,295
In situ probing electrified interfacial water structures at atomically flat surfaces
Li, C.-Y., Le, J.-B., Wang, Y.-H., Chen, S., Yang, Z.-L., Li, J.-F., Cheng, J., & Tian, Z.-Q. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0356-x · Cited by 789
Self-citationWu, X., Fan, X., Xie, S., Lin, J., Cheng, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0148-8 · Cited by 649
Self-citationLe, J.-B., Fan, Q.-Y., Li, J.-Q., & Cheng, J. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb1219 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, J., Liu, X., VandeVondele, J., Sulpizi, M., & Sprik, M.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-11-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3522-3529
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2316268750
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redox Potentials and Acidity Constants from Density Functional Theory Based Molecular Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar500268y
- The paper
- Cheng, J., Liu, X., VandeVondele, J., Sulpizi, M., & Sprik, M. (2014). Redox Potentials and Acidity Constants from Density Functional Theory Based Molecular Dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar500268y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.