Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theoretical Thermodynamics for Large Molecules: Walking the Thin Line between Accuracy and Computational Cost

Schwabe, Tobias, Grimme, Stefan·2008·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

The thermodynamic properties of molecules are of fundamental interest in physics, chemistry, and biology. This Account deals with the developments that we have made in the about last five years to find quantum chemical electronic structure methods that have the prospect of being applicable to larger molecules. The typical target accuracy is about 0.5-1 kcal mol(-1) for chemical reaction and 0.1 kcal mol(-1) for conformational energies. These goals can be achieved when a few physically motivated corrections to first-principles methods are introduced to standard quantum chemical techniques. These do not lead to a significantly increased computational expense, and thus our methods have the computer hardware requirements of the corresponding standard treatments. Together with the use of density-fitting (RI) integral approximations, routine computations on systems with about 100 non-hydrogen atoms (2000-4000 basis functions) can be performed on modern PCs. Our improvements regarding accuracy are basically due to the use of modified second-order perturbation theory to account for many-particle (electron correlation) effects. Such nonlocal correlations are responsible for important parts of the interaction in and between atoms and molecules. A common example is the long-range dispersion interaction that lead to van der Waals complexes, but as shown here also the conventional thermodynamics of large molecules is significantly influenced by intramolecular dispersion effects. We first present the basic theoretical ideas behind our approaches, which are the spin-component-scaled Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (SCS-MP2) and double-hybrid density functionals (DHDF). Furthermore, the effect of the independently developed empirical dispersion correction (DFT-D) is discussed. Together with the use of large atomic orbital basis sets (of at least triple- or quadruple-zeta quality), the accuracy of the new methods is even competitive with computationally very expensive coupled-cluster methods, but they still remain routinely applicable for day-to-day chemical problems. This is demonstrated for the G3/99 benchmark set of heats of formation, 34 organic isomerization energies, and barriers for a number of pericyclic reactions. As an electronically complicated example, the relative energies of three isomeric Au(8) clusters are considered. In general, we recommend the very robust B2PLYP-D density functional approach for heat of formation calculations and for electronically complicated situations like transition metal complexes or open-shell species. With B2PLYP-D, an unprecedented low mean absolute deviation for the G3/99 test set with a DFT approach of 1.7 kcal mol(-1) has been achieved. For closed-shell main-group molecules and many relative energies, SCS-MP2 is the method of choice, because it completely avoids the self-interaction error problem that still plagues current DFT. In critical cases, it is recommended to apply SCS-MP2 and B2PLYP-D simultaneously, where also the comparison with standard MP2 and density functionals like B3LYP may lead to additional insight.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar700208h

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Schwabe, T., & Grimme, S.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2008-03-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
569-579
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2060079271
Cited by
354
References
3
FWCI
25.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.