The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Architectonic Quantum Dot Solids
Abstract
Three things largely determine the electronic properties of a crystal: the energy levels of the atoms or lattice sites, the coupling between adjacent sites, and the symmetry of the solid. Imagine being able to control each of these properties separately, and therefore being able to “design” a solid with a prescribed set of electronic properties. For an atomic solid, this would amount to being able to tune the electronegativity of an atom, to control the strength of the covalent interactions within the lattice, and to choose the crystal structure. While the chemistry of the periodic table does not permit such control, the chemistry of “artificial atoms”,1 or quantum dots (QDs), does. In this Account, we will discuss one example of “designing” a unique electronic property into a QD solid. This property, which is the ability of the solid to reversibly pass through a metal−insulator (MI) transition under ambient conditions, is something that has not been previously demonstrated for a more traditional solid. A two-dimensional (2D) hexagonal superlattice of organically passivated silver QDs was fabricated as a Langmuir monolayer. Selecting a particular size of QD controlled the (super)lattice site energies. The coupling between adjacent QDs was coarsely controlled by selection of the organic surface passivant, and precisely controlled by compressing the superlattice using the Langmuir technique. By using the title “Architectonic2 Quantum Dot Solids”, we emphasize that many of the collective properties of the superlattice were rationally designed into the material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
One‐Dimensional Nanostructures: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications
Xia, Y., Yang, P., Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Mayers, B., Gates, B., Yin, Y., Kim, F., & Yan, H. (2003) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200390087 · Cited by 8,559
Chemistry and Properties of Nanocrystals of Different Shapes
Burda, C., Chen, X., Narayanan, R., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030063a · Cited by 7,230
Shape‐Controlled Synthesis of Metal Nanocrystals: Simple Chemistry Meets Complex Physics?
Xia, Y., Xiong, Y., Lim, B., & Skrabalak, S. E. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802248 · Cited by 5,702
Synthesis and Characterization of Monodisperse Nanocrystals and Close-Packed Nanocrystal Assemblies
Murray, C. B., Kagan, C. R., & Bawendi, M. G. (2000) · Annual Review of Materials Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.545 · Cited by 4,353
Photophysical, Photochemical and Photocatalytic Aspects of Metal Nanoparticles
Kamat, P. V. (2002) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0209289 · Cited by 1,924
Metadata
- Authors
- Markovich, G., Collier, C. P., Henrichs, S. E., Remacle, F., Levine, R. D., & Heath, J. R.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-01-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 415-423
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W1970994785
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Architectonic Quantum Dot Solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ar980039x
- The paper
- Markovich, G., Collier, C. P., Henrichs, S. E., Remacle, F., Levine, R. D., & Heath, J. R. (1999). Architectonic Quantum Dot Solids. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar980039x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.