Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anomalous Fluorescence Enhancement of Cy3 and Cy3.5 versus Anomalous Fluorescence Loss of Cy5 and Cy7 upon Covalent Linking to IgG and Noncovalent Binding to Avidin

Gruber, Hermann J., Hahn, Christoph D., Kada, Gerald, Riener, Christian K., Harms, Gregory S., Ahrer, Werner, Dax, Thomas G., Knaus, Hans-Günther·2000·Bioconjugate Chemistry

Abstract

This study provides a critical examination of protein labeling with Cy3, Cy5, and other Cy dyes. Two alternate situations were tested. (i) Antibodies were covalently labeled with Cy dye succinimidyl ester at various fluorophore/protein ratios and the fluorescence of the labeled antibodies was compared to that of free Cy dye. (ii) Fluorescent biotin derivatives were synthesized by derivatizing ethylenediamine with one biotin and one Cy3 (or Cy5) residue. The fluorescence properties of these biotin-Cy dye conjugates were examined at all ligand/(strept)avidin ratios (0 </= n </= 4). The results showed an astounding discrepancy between Cy3 and Cy5: Cy3-labeled antibodies fluoresced very well, even at high Cy3/protein ratios, and the same applied to (strept)avidin with up to four bound biotin-Cy3 conjugates. In contrast, antibodies with six covalently bound Cy5 labels (obtained with the recommended procedure) were almost nonfluorescent, only at 2-3 Cy5 labels/IgG some moderate fluorescence was obtained. By analogy, the biotin-Cy3 conjugate fluoresced intensely, even at high ligand/avidin ratio, in contrast to the weakly fluorescing biotin-Cy5 conjugate. Three mechanisms are responsible for the discrepancy between Cy3 and Cy5. (i) Attachment of Cy3 to a protein's surface causes an anomalous enhancement in fluorescence (by 2-3-fold) while no enhancement occurs with Cy5. (ii) Mutual quenching of IgG-bound Cy dyes by resonance energy transfer is much more pronounced for Cy5 labels than for Cy3. (iii) In IgG with six bound Cy5 labels, about one-third of the labels adopt a nonfluorescent state which is characterized by a large UV-vis absorption maximum at 600 nm instead of at 650 nm. Cy3.5 was found to mimick the properties of Cy3, while Cy7, and to some extent also Cy5.5, were similar to Cy5. In conclusion the Cy dye series is divided into two groups: Antibodies with multiple Cy3 or Cy3.5 labels yield bright fluorescence while extensive quenching occurs in antibodies labeled with Cy5 and Cy7.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bc000015m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gruber, H. J., Hahn, C. D., Kada, G., Riener, C. K., Harms, G. S., Ahrer, W., Dax, T. G., & Knaus, H.-G.
Venue
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Published
2000-08-31
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
696-704
ISSN
  • 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4812
OpenAlex
W2069064741
Cited by
273
References
0
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.