Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Site-Specific Conjugation of Boron-Containing Dendrimers to Anti-EGF Receptor Monoclonal Antibody Cetuximab (IMC-C225) and Its Evaluation as a Potential Delivery Agent for Neutron Capture Therapy

Wu, Gong, Barth, Rolf F., Yang, Weilian, Chatterjee, Madhumita, Tjarks, Werner, Ciesielski, Michael J., Fenstermaker, Robert A.·2004·Bioconjugate Chemistry

Abstract

The gene encoding EGFR often is amplified in human gliomas, and the receptor itself has been considered as a potential target for the specific delivery of therapeutic agents to brain tumors. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the use of the chimeric MoAb cetuximab (IMC-C225), which is directed against EGFR and EGFRvIII, as a boron delivery agent for neutron capture therapy (NCT) of brain tumors. As determined by 125I-cetuximab radioligand binding assays, F98 rat glioma cells, which had been transfected with the gene encoding EGFR (F98EGFR), expressed 1.60 +/- 0.13 x 10(5) receptor sites/cell with a Ka = 1.64 +/- 0.32 x 10(8) M-1). F98 cells transfected with the gene encoding a mutant form of EGFR, designated the F98EGFRvIII glioma, expressed 1.07 +/- 0.10 x 10(5) receptor sites/cell with a Ka = 2.18 +/- 0.54 x 10(9) M-1 compared to background levels expressed on F98 wild-type cells (F98WT). A heavily boronated, fifth generation polyamidoamine (PAMAM or "starburst") dendrimer, G5-B1100, was linked to oligosaccharide moieties, which were distant from antigen binding sites of cetuximab, by means of the heterobifunctional reagents N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP) and N-(k-maleimidoundecanoic acid) hydrazide (KMUH). The resulting bioconjugate, designated C225-G5-B1100, was separated from the unconjugated dendrimer using a Sephacryl S-300 column. On the basis of the relative concentration ratios of boron and protein, there were approximately 1100 boron atoms per molecule of cetuximab with only a slight reduction of Ka. The localization of C225-G5-B1100 or G5-B1100 in rats bearing intracerebral implants of either F98EGFR or F98WT gliomas was determined 24 h following direct intratumoral (i.t.) injection at which time 92.3 +/- 23.3 micrograms B/g tumor was localized in F98EGFR gliomas versus 36.5 +/- 18.8 micrograms B/g tumor in F98WT gliomas and 13.4 +/- 6.1 micrograms in normal brain. In contrast, only 6.7 +/- 3.6 micrograms B/g tumor of G5-B1100 was localized in F98EGFR gliomas following i.t. injection, thereby demonstrating specific molecular targeting of EGFR. Based on these data, BNCT studies will be initiated in F98EGFR glioma bearing rats to evaluate C225-G5-B1100 for the treatment of intracerebral brain tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bc0341674

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wu, G., Barth, R. F., Yang, W., Chatterjee, M., Tjarks, W., Ciesielski, M. J., & Fenstermaker, R. A.
Venue
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Published
2003-12-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
185-194
ISSN
  • 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4812
OpenAlex
W2042183644
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.