The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduction−Alkylation Strategies for the Modification of Specific Monoclonal Antibody Disulfides
Open accessAbstract
Site-specific conjugation of small molecules and enzymes to monoclonal antibodies has broad utility in the formation of conjugates for therapeutic, diagnostic, or structural applications. Precise control over the location of conjugation would yield highly homogeneous materials that could have improved biological properties. We describe for the first time chemical reduction and oxidation methods that lead to preferential cleavage of particular monoclonal antibody interchain disulfides using the anti-CD30 IgG1 monoclonal antibody cAC10. Alkylation of the resulting cAC10 cysteine thiols with the potent antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) enabled the assignment of drug conjugation location by purification with hydrophobic interaction chromatography followed by analysis using reversed-phase HPLC and capillary electrophoresis. These analytical methods demonstrated that treating cAC10 with reducing agents such as DTT caused preferential reduction of heavy-light chain disulfides, while reoxidation of fully reduced cAC10 interchain disulfides caused preferential reformation of heavy-light chain disulfides. Following MMAE conjugation, the resulting conjugates had isomeric homogeneity as high as 60-90%, allowing for control of the distribution of molecular species. The resulting conjugates are highly active both in vitro and in vivo and are well tolerated at efficacious doses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index
Junutula, J. R., Raab, H., Clark, S., Bhakta, S., Leipold, D. D., Weir, S., Chen, Y., Simpson, M., Tsai, S. P., Dennis, M. S., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1480 · Cited by 1,382
Developments and Challenges for mAb-Based Therapeutics
Goswami, S., Wang, W., Arakawa, T., & Ohtake, S. (2013) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib2030452 · Cited by 144
Minor groove binder antibody conjugates employing a water soluble β-glucuronide linker
Jeffrey, S. C., Nguyen, M. T., Moser, R. F., Meyer, D. L., Miyamoto, J. B., & Senter, P. D. (2007) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.071 · Cited by 59
Self-citationHippach, M. B., Schwartz, I., Pei, J., Huynh, J., Kawai, Y., & Zhu, M. M. (2018) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.2697 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, M. M. C., Beam, K. S., Cerveny, C. G., Hamblett, K. J., Blackmore, R. S., Torgov, M. Y., Handley, F. G. M., Ihle, N. C., Senter, P. D., & Alley, S. C.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1282-1290
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2023034663
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.