The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PLGA Nanoparticle−Peptide Conjugate Effectively Targets Intercellular Cell-Adhesion Molecule-1
Open accessAbstract
Targeted delivery of therapeutics possesses the potential to localize therapeutic agents to a specific tissue as a mechanism to enhance treatment efficacy and abrogate side effects. Antibodies have been used clinically as therapeutic agents and are currently being explored for targeting drug-loaded nanoparticles. Peptides such as RGD peptides are also being developed as an inexpensive and stable alternative to antibodies. In this study, cyclo(1,12)PenITDGEATDSGC (cLABL) peptide was used to target nanoparticles to human umbilical cord vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers that have upregulated intercellular cell-adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression. The cLABL peptide has been previously demonstrated to possess high avidity for ICAM-1 receptors on the cell surface. Poly( dl-lactic-coglycolic acid) nanoparticles conjugated with polyethylene glycol and cLABL demonstrated rapid binding to HUVEC with upregulated ICAM-1, which was induced by treating cells with the proinflammatory cytokine, interferon-gamma. Binding of the nanoparticles could be efficiently blocked by preincubating cells with free peptide suggesting that the binding of the nanoparticles is specifically mediated by surface peptide binding to ICAM-1 on HUVEC. The targeted nanoparticles were rapidly endocytosed and trafficked to lysosomes to a greater extent than the untargeted PLGA-PEG nanoparticles. Verification of peptide-mediated nanoparticle targeting to ICAM-1 may ultimately lead to targeting therapeutic agents to inflammatory sites expressing upregulated ICAM-1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eniola, A. O., & Hammer, D. A. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.003 · Cited by 72
Cited by
Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery
Farokhzad, O. C., & Langer, R. (2009) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn900002m · Cited by 3,348
Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation
Kamaly, N., Xiao, Z., Valencia, P. M., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15344k · Cited by 1,730
Nicolas, J., Mura, S., Brambilla, D., Mackiewicz, N., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f · Cited by 1,270
Biomimetic nanoparticles for inflammation targeting
Jin, K., Luo, Z., Zhang, B., & Pang, Z. (2018) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2017.12.002 · Cited by 359
αVβ3 Integrin-Targeted PLGA-PEG Nanoparticles for Enhanced Anti-tumor Efficacy of a Pt(IV) Prodrug
Graf, N., Bielenberg, D. R., Kolishetti, N., Muus, C., Banyard, J., Farokhzad, O. C., & Lippard, S. J. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn301148e · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, N., Chittasupho, C., Duangrat, C., Siahaan, T. J., & Berkland, C.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-13
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-152
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2119834954
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.