The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Cellular Uptake Using 22 CPPs in 4 Different Cell Lines
Abstract
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short peptides able to penetrate cell membranes and translocate different cargoes into cells. Although recently the topic of many research articles, to our best knowledge no single systematic study of CPPs has been carried out as yet, meaning information can only by gathered piece by piece from different sources. We therefore decided to start analytical screening of CPP specificity in cell lines. We used 22 different CPPs, which have all been published before, and present the first analytical screen in 4 selected cell lines (MDCK, HEK293, HeLa, and Cos-7). Furthermore, we examined the influence of different conditions, such as protease inhibitors, incubation conditions, endocytosis inhibitors, temperature, and cytotoxicity. We clearly demonstrate that the 22 CPPs can be classified into 3 groups based on their internalization properties, even after trypsinization. Moreover, we show that additional agents, which should increase cellular uptake or dissolve endosomal/lysosomal entrapped CPPs, only have low effects. Our intensive screening under standardized conditions provides the opportunity to compare cellular uptake of CPPs, an important step for the use of CPPs as peptidic vectors in the medical field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wadia, J. S., Stan, R. V., & Dowdy, S. F. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm996 · Cited by 1,647
Cited by
Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Design, Synthesis, and Applications
Copolovici, D. M., Langel, K., Eriste, E., & Langel, Ü. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4057269 · Cited by 963
Recent progress of cell-penetrating peptides as new carriers for intracellular cargo delivery
Wang, F., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Guo, S., & Jin, F. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.11.020 · Cited by 377
Jiang, T., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Lv, H., Zhou, J., Li, C., Hou, L., & Zhang, Q. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.027 · Cited by 359
Secondary structure of cell-penetrating peptides controls membrane interaction and insertion
Eiríksdóttir, E., Konate, K., Langel, Ü., Divita, G., & Deshayes, S. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.03.005 · Cited by 323
Qian, Z., LaRochelle, J. R., Jiang, B., Lian, W., Hard, R. L., Selner, N. G., Luechapanichkul, R., Barrios, A. M., & Pei, D. (2014) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi5004102 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, J., Kretzschmar, I., Volkmer, R., & Boisguerin, P.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-19
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2363-2374
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W1995518628
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Cellular Uptake Using 22 CPPs in 4 Different Cell Lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bc800194e
- The paper
- Mueller, J., Kretzschmar, I., Volkmer, R., & Boisguerin, P. (2008). Comparison of Cellular Uptake Using 22 CPPs in 4 Different Cell Lines. Bioconjugate Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc800194e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.