The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening of cyclic peptide phage libraries identifies ligands that bind streptavidin with high affinities
Abstract
The screening of combinatorial peptide libraries has emerged as an important tool in the discovery of novel substrates or ligands for enzyme and receptor targets. For example, screening linear peptide libraries using streptavidin as a model receptor system has previously identified many low-affinity peptide ligands, all of which contain the common motif His-Pro-Gln (HPQ). We reasoned that constraining the conformational freedom of linear peptides by cyclization in a library would yield peptide ligands of increased affinity. Three different cyclic peptide libraries were constructed in an M13 phage display system as N-terminal pIII protein fusions. The random peptide sequences were flanked by two cysteine residues, which allows efficient disulfide bond formation and cyclization during phage assembly. These cyclic peptide libraries were screened with streptavidin as the model receptor system. Many sequences, all of which contained the motif His-Pro-Gln (HPQ), were discovered, and in the preceding paper, the structures of complexes of streptavidin-bound cyclic and linear peptides are described (Katz, 1995). Analysis of binding kinetics and affinities demonstrated that the conformationally constrained cyclic peptides bound streptavidin with affinities up to 3 orders of magnitude higher than linear peptides identified in previous library screens. These results demonstrate the potential of screening conformationally constrained peptide libraries for high-affinity novel receptor ligands or enzyme substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Current Status of Heterocyclic Combinatorial Libraries
Nefzi, A., Ostresh, J. M., & Houghten, R. A. (1997) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960010b · Cited by 586
Free-floating ultrathin two-dimensional crystals from sequence-specific peptoid polymers
Nam, K. T., Shelby, S. A., Choi, P. H., Marciel, A. B., Chen, R., Tan, L., Chu, T. K., Mesch, R. A., Lee, B.-C., Connolly, M. D., et al. (2010) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2742 · Cited by 417
Phage selection of bicyclic peptides
Rentero Rebollo, I., & Heinis, C. (2013) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.12.008 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Giebel, L. B., Cass, R., Milligan, D. L., Young, D., Arze, R., & Johnson, C.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-11-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 15430-15435
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1965176789
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening of cyclic peptide phage libraries identifies ligands that bind streptavidin with high affinities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00047a006
- The paper
- Giebel, L. B., Cass, R., Milligan, D. L., Young, D., Arze, R., & Johnson, C. (1995). Screening of cyclic peptide phage libraries identifies ligands that bind streptavidin with high affinities. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00047a006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.