Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2

Jackson, Sophie E., Moracci, Marco, elMasry, Nadia, Johnson, Christopher M., Fersht, Alan R.·1993·Biochemistry

Abstract

Hydrophobic residues in the core of a truncated form of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) have been mutated in order to measure their contribution to the stability of the protein. The free energy of unfolding of wild-type and mutants was measured by both guanidinium chloride-induced denaturation and differential scanning calorimetry. The two methods give results for the changes in free energy on mutation that agree to within 1% or 2%. The average change in the free energy of unfolding (+/- standard deviation) for an Ile-->Val mutation is 1.2 +/- 0.1 kcal mol-1, for a Val-->Ala mutation 3.4 +/- 1.5 kcal mol-1, and for either an Ile-->Ala or a Leu-->Ala mutation 3.6 +/- 0.6 kcal mol-1. This gives an average change in the free energy of unfolding for deleting one methylene group of 1.3 +/- 0.5 kcal mol-1. Two significant correlations were found between the change in the free energy of unfolding between wild-type and mutant, delta delta GU-F, and the environment of the mutated residue in the protein. The first is between delta delta GU-F and the difference in side-chain solvent-accessible area buried between wild-type and mutant (correlation coefficient = 0.81, 10 points). The second and slightly better correlation was found between delta delta GU-F and N, the number of methyl/methylene groups within a 6-A radius of the hydrophobic group deleted (correlation coefficient = 0.84, 10 points). The latter correlation is very similar to that found previously for barnase, suggesting that this relationship is general and applies to the hydrophobic cores of other globular proteins. The combined data for C12 and barnase clearly show a better correlation with N (correlation coefficient = 0.87, 30 points) than with the change in the solvent-accessible surface area (correlation coefficient = 0.82, 30 points). This indicates that the packing density around a particular residue is important in determining the contribution the residue makes to protein stability. In one case, Ile-->Val76, a mutation which deletes the C delta 1 methyl group of a buried side chain, a surprising result was obtained. This mutant was found to be more stable than wild-type by 0.2 +/- 0.1 kcal mol-1. We have solved and analyzed the crystal structure of this mutant and find that there are small movements of side chains in the core, the largest of which, 0.7 A, is a movement of the side chain that has been mutated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00093a001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, S. E., Moracci, M., elMasry, N., Johnson, C. M., & Fersht, A. R.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1993-10-01
Volume
32
Issue
42
Pages
11259-11269
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2089685973
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00093a001
The paper
Jackson, S. E., Moracci, M., elMasry, N., Johnson, C. M., & Fersht, A. R. (1993). Effect of cavity-creating mutations in the hydrophobic core of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00093a001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.