The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli Fpg protein formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase: excision of purine lesions in DNA produced by ionizing radiation or photosensitization
Abstract
We have investigated the excision of a variety of modified bases from DNA by the Escherichia coli Fpg protein (formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase) [Boiteux, S., O'Connor, T. R., Lederer, F., Gouyette, A., & Laval, J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 3916-3922]. DNA used as a substrate was modified either by exposure to ionizing radiation or by photosensitization using visible light in the presence of methylene blue (MB). The technique of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, which can unambiguously identify and quantitate pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions in DNA, was used for analysis of hydrolyzed and derivatized DNA samples. Thirteen products resulting from pyrimidines and purines were detected in gamma-irradiated DNA, whereas only the formation of 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyGua) and 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OH-Gua) was observed in visible light/MB-treated DNA. Analysis of gamma-irradiated DNA after incubation with the Fpg protein followed by precipitation revealed that the Fpg protein significantly excised 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyAde), FapyGua, and 8-OH-Gua. The excision of a small but detectable amount of 8-hydroxyadenine was also observed. The detection of these products in the supernatant fractions of the same samples confirmed their excision by the enzyme. Nine pyrimidine-derived lesions were not excised. The Fpg protein also excised FapyGua and 8-OH-Gua from visible light/MB-treated DNA. The presence of these products in the supernatant fractions confirmed their excision.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease
Cooke, M. S., Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Lunec, J. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0752rev · Cited by 3,245
UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review
Sinha, R. P., & Häder, D.-P. (2002) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b201230h · Cited by 1,978
Oxidative DNA damage and disease: induction, repair and significance
Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Cooke, M. S. (2004) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,372
Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components
Ravanat, J.-L., Douki, T., & Cadet, J. (2001) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(01)00206-8 · Cited by 980
The comet assay: what can it really tell us?
Collins, A. R., Dobson, V. L., Dušinská, M., Kennedy, G., & Štětina, R. (1997) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00013-4 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Boiteux, S., Gajewski, E., Laval, J., & Dizdaroglu, M.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1992-01-14
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 106-110
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1969190950
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli Fpg protein formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase: excision of purine lesions in DNA produced by ionizing radiation or photosensitization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00116a016
- The paper
- Boiteux, S., Gajewski, E., Laval, J., & Dizdaroglu, M. (1992). Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli Fpg protein formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase: excision of purine lesions in DNA produced by ionizing radiation or photosensitization. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00116a016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
