Cited by 208HIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentHIV Research and TreatmentEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Fidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase copying RNA in vitro

Ji, Jiuping, Loeb, Lawrence A.·1992·Biochemistry

Abstract

The genomic hypervariation of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) could result from misincorporations by the viral reverse transcriptase. We developed an assay for reverse transcriptase fidelity during RNA-dependent as well as DNA-dependent DNA polymerization in vitro. A lacZ alpha RNA fragment transcribed by T3 RNA polymerase was used to mimic first-strand reverse transcription. The corresponding DNA template was used to examine errors by reverse transcriptase during second-strand DNA synthesis. With both templates, the mutations introduced by reverse transcriptase were identified by their mutant phenotypes in an M13 lacZ alpha-complementation assay. We found that the reverse transcriptase from human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1 RT) was less accurate than the reverse transcriptase from Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV RT) or the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Pol I) on either RNA or DNA templates. The frequency of misincorporation by HIV-1 RT was 1 in 6900 nucleotides polymerized on the RNA template and 1 in 5900 on the DNA template. The error rates of MLV RT and Pol I on the RNA template were less than 1 in 28,000 and 37,000, respectively. The most frequent mutations produced by HIV-1 RT copying the RNA template were C----T transitions and G----T transversions resulting from misincorporation of dAMP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00119a002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In assays of RNA-dependent DNA synthesis, there is no significant difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs.

    “Interestingly, assays designed to read mutations during RNA-dependent DNA synthesis reveal no significant difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs, indicating that HIV-1 RT’s misincorporation rate is higher during DNA-dependent DNA synthesis (Roberts et al. 1988, Boyer et al. 1992, Ji and Loeb 1992, Yu and Goodman 1992, Bakhanashvili and Hizi 1993, Kerr and Anderson 1997).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ji, J., & Loeb, L. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1992-02-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
954-958
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W1968937894
Cited by
208
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r35ca039903-14)
  • Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, Yale University
  • Health and Social Care Delivery Research
  • National Cancer Institute (R 35-CA-39903)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, error rate, misincorporation, RNA-dependent DNA synthesis, Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, C>T transitions
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cattle, DNA, Viral, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, RNA, Viral, Templates, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, HIV-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review