The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of the Cu2+Binding Sites in the N-Terminal Domain of the Prion Protein by EPR and CD Spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Recent evidence indicates that the prion protein (PrP) plays a role in copper metabolism in the central nervous system. The N-terminal region of human PrP contains four sequential copies of the highly conserved octarepeat sequence PHGGGWGQ spanning residues 60-91. This region selectively binds divalent copper ions (Cu(2+)) in vivo. To elucidate the specific mode and site of binding, we have studied a series of Cu(2+)-peptide complexes composed of 1-, 2-, and 4-octarepeats and several sub-octarepeat peptides, by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR, conventional X-band and low-frequency S-band) and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. At pH 7.45, two EPR active binding modes are observed where the dominant mode appears to involve coordination of three nitrogens and one oxygen to the copper ion, while in the minor mode two nitrogens and two oxygens coordinate. ESEEM spectra demonstrate that the histidine imidazole contributes one of these nitrogens. The truncated sequence HGGGW gives EPR and CD that are indistinguishable from the dominant binding mode observed for the multi-octarepeat sequences and may therefore comprise the fundamental Cu(2+) binding unit. Both EPR and CD titration experiments demonstrate rigorously a 1:1 Cu(2+)/octarepeat binding stoichiometry regardless of the number of octarepeats in a given peptide sequence. Detailed spin integration of the EPR signals demonstrates that all of the bound Cu(2+) is detected thereby ruling out strong exchange coupling that is often found when there is imidazolate bridging between paramagnetic metal centers. A model consistent with these data is proposed in which Cu(2+) is bound to the nitrogen of the histidine imidazole side chain and to two nitrogens from sequential glycine backbone amides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sundberg, R. J., & Martin, R. B. (1974) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60290a003 · Cited by 1,147
Cited by
Gaggelli, E., Kozlowski, H., Valensin, D., & Valensin, G. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040410w · Cited by 1,729
Physiology of the prion protein
Linden, R., Martins, V. R., Prado, M. A. M., Cammarota, M., Izquierdo, I., & Brentani, R. R. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2007 · Cited by 617
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Xie, H., Vucetic, S., Iakoucheva, L. M., Oldfield, C. J., Dunker, A. K., Obradovic, Z., & Uversky, V. N. (2007) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr060394e · Cited by 382
Amyloid-β Binds Cu 2+ in a Mononuclear Metal Ion Binding Site
Karr, J. W., Kaupp, L. J., & Szalai, V. A. (2004) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0488028 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Aronoff-Spencer, E., Burns, C. S., Avdievich, N. I., Gerfen, G. J., Peisach, J., Antholine, W. E., Ball, H. L., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., & Millhauser, G. L.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-10-21
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 13760-13771
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2032648665
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of the Cu2+Binding Sites in the N-Terminal Domain of the Prion Protein by EPR and CD Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi001472t
- The paper
- Aronoff-Spencer, E., Burns, C. S., Avdievich, N. I., Gerfen, G. J., Peisach, J., Antholine, W. E., Ball, H. L., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., & Millhauser, G. L. (2000). Identification of the Cu2+Binding Sites in the N-Terminal Domain of the Prion Protein by EPR and CD Spectroscopy. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi001472t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.