The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contribution of Electric Field (Δψ) to Steady-State Transthylakoid Proton Motive Force (pmf) in Vitro and in Vivo. Control of pmf Parsing into Δψ and ΔpH by Ionic Strength
Abstract
The observed levels of Delta G(ATP) in chloroplasts, as well as the activation behavior of the CF(1)CF(0)-ATP synthase, suggest a minimum transthylakoid proton motive force (pmf) equivalent to a Delta pH of approximately 2.5 units. If, as is commonly believed, all transthylakoid pmf is stored as Delta pH, this would indicate a lumen pH of less than approximately 5. In contrast, we have presented evidence that the pH of the thylakoid lumen does not drop below pH approximately 5.8 [Kramer, D. M., Sacksteder, C. A., and Cruz, J. A. (1999) Photosynth. Res. 60, 151-163], leading us to propose that Delta psi can contribute to steady-state pmf. In this work, it is demonstrated, through assays on isolated thylakoids and computer simulations, that thylakoids can store a substantial fraction of pmf as Delta psi, provided that the activities of ions permeable to the thylakoid membrane in the chloroplast stromal compartment are relatively low and the buffering capacity (beta) for protons of the lumen is relatively high. Measurements of the light-induced electrochromic shift (ECS) confirm the ionic strength behavior of steady-state Delta psi in isolated, partially uncoupled thylakoids. Measurements of the ECS in intact plants illuminated for 65 s were consistent with low concentrations of permeable ions and approximately 50% storage of pmf as Delta psi. We propose that the plant cell, possibly at the level of the inner chloroplast envelope, can control the parsing of pmf into Delta psi and Delta pH by regulating the ionic strength and balance of the chloroplast. In addition, this work demonstrates that, under certain conditions, the kinetics of the light-induced ECS can be used to estimate the fractions of pmf stored as Delta psi and Delta pH both in vitro and in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ion antiport accelerates photosynthetic acclimation in fluctuating light environments
Armbruster, U., Carrillo, L. R., Venema, K., Pavlovic, L., Schmidtmann, E., Kornfeld, A., Jahns, P., Berry, J. A., Kramer, D. M., & Jonikas, M. C. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6439 · Cited by 259
Self-citationZHU, X., WANG, Y., ORT, D. R., & LONG, S. P. (2013) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12025 · Cited by 146
In Silico Analysis of the Regulation of the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain in C3 Plants
Morales, A., Yin, X., Harbinson, J., Driever, S. M., Molenaar, J., Kramer, D. M., & Struik, P. C. (2018) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.17.00779 · Cited by 56
Self-citationPohland, A.-C., & Schneider, D. (2019) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/hsz-2018-0476 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruz, J. A., Sacksteder, C. A., Kanazawa, A., & Kramer, D. M.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-01-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1226-1237
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1974279757
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Electric Field (Δψ) to Steady-State Transthylakoid Proton Motive Force (pmf) in Vitro and in Vivo. Control of pmf Parsing into Δψ and ΔpH by Ionic Strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi0018741
- The paper
- Cruz, J. A., Sacksteder, C. A., Kanazawa, A., & Kramer, D. M. (2001). Contribution of Electric Field (Δψ) to Steady-State Transthylakoid Proton Motive Force (pmf) in Vitro and in Vivo. Control of pmf Parsing into Δψ and ΔpH by Ionic Strength. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0018741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.