The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A kinetic study of the competition between renaturation and aggregation during the refolding of denatured-reduced egg white lysozyme
Abstract
The recovery of proteins following denaturation is optimal at low protein concentrations. The decrease in yield at high concentrations has been explained by the kinetic competition of folding and "wrong aggregation". In the present study, the renaturation-reoxidation of hen and turkey egg white lysozyme was used as a model system to analyze the committed step in aggregate formation. The yield of renatured protein for both enzymes decreased with increasing concentration in the folding process. In addition, the yield decreased with increasing concentrations of the enzyme in the denatured state (i.e., prior to its dilution in the renaturation buffer). The kinetics of renaturation of turkey lysozyme were shown to be very similar to those of hen lysozyme, with a half-time of about 4.5 min at 20 degrees C. The rate of formation of molecular species that lead to formation of aggregates (and therefore fail to renature) was shown to be rapid. Most of the reaction occurred in less than 5 s after the transfer to renaturation buffer, and after 1 min, the reaction was essentially completed. Yet, by observing the effects of the delayed addition of denatured hen lysozyme to refolding turkey lysozyme, it was shown that folding intermediates become resistant to aggregation only much more slowly, with kinetics indistinguishable from those observed for the appearance of native molecules. The interactions leading to the formation of aggregates were nonspecific and do not involve disulfide bonds. These observations are discussed in terms of possible kinetic and structural aspects of the folding pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vallejo, L. F., & Rinas, U. (2004) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-3-11 · Cited by 311
van den Berg, B., Wain, R., Dobson, C. M., & Ellis, R. J. (2000) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.15.3870 · Cited by 269
Puig, A., & Gilbert, H. F. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37352-0 · Cited by 272
Excluded Volume Effects on the Refolding and Assembly of an Oligomeric Protein
Galán, A., Sot, B., Llorca, O., Carrascosa, J. L., Valpuesta, J. M., & Muga, A. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m006861200 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberg, M. E., Rudolph, R., & Jaenicke, R.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1991-03-19
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2790-2797
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2011808162
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A kinetic study of the competition between renaturation and aggregation during the refolding of denatured-reduced egg white lysozyme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00225a008
- The paper
- Goldberg, M. E., Rudolph, R., & Jaenicke, R. (1991). A kinetic study of the competition between renaturation and aggregation during the refolding of denatured-reduced egg white lysozyme. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00225a008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.